azure-rest-api-specs
azure-rest-api-specs copied to clipboard
Al/tsv noop
closes #24813 closes #24818
Hi, @ckairen! Thank you for your pull request. To help get your PR merged:
Generated ApiView
comment added to this PR. You can use ApiView to show API versions diff.
Swagger Validation Report
️️✔️
BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️🔄
CredScan inProgress [Detail]
️️✔️
LintDiff succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for LintDiff.
️️✔️
Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️
ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️
~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ServiceAPIReadinessTest.
️️✔️
SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️
CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️
TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️🔄
PoliCheck inProgress [Detail]
️️✔️
PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
️️✔️
CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for CadlValidation.
️️✔️
TypeSpec Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for TypeSpec Validation.
️🔄
PR Summary inProgress [Detail]
️⌛
All merging requirements met pending [Detail]
Swagger pipeline restarted successfully, please wait for status update in this comment.
Swagger pipeline restarted successfully. If there is ApiView generated, it will be updated in this comment.
/azp run specs - typespec - pr
No commit pushedDate could be found for PR 24825 in repo Azure/azure-rest-api-specs
The failures you saw on Windows are expected for now. This is #24791, which I will fix after this PR is merged.
Hi @ckairen! The automation detected breaking changes in this pull request. As a result, it added the BreakingChangeReviewRequired
label.
You cannot proceed with merging this PR until you complete one of the following action items:
ACTION ITEM ALTERNATIVE A: Fix the breaking change.
Please consult the documentation provided in the relevant validation failures.
ACTION ITEM ALTERNATIVE B: Request approval.
Alternatively, if you cannot fix the breaking changes, then you can request an approval for them. Please follow the process described in the High-level Breaking Change Process doc.
ACTION ITEM ALTERNATIVE C: Report false positive.
If you think there are no breaking changes, i.e. the validation should pass yet it fails, then proceed as explained in ACTION ITEM ALTERNATIVE B.
This applies even if the breaking change tool fails with internal runtime error. In such case a manual breaking change review is necessary.