azure-rest-api-specs
azure-rest-api-specs copied to clipboard
Updated text for property isSoftDeleteFeatureStateEditable
ARM (Management Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request
Purpose of this PR
What's the purpose of this PR? Check all that apply. This is mandatory!
- [ ] New API version. (Such PR should have been generated with OpenAPI Hub, per this wiki doc.)
- [ ] Update existing version for a new feature. (This is applicable only when you are revising a private preview API version.)
- [x] Update existing version to fix swagger quality issues in S360.
- [ ] Other, please clarify:
- _ _
Due diligence checklist
To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:
- [x] I have reviewed the general guidance on the spec PR review process: https://aka.ms/specprreview.
- [x] I confirm this PR is modifying Azure Resource Manager (ARM) related specifications, and not data-plane related specifications.
- [x] I commit to follow the Breaking Change Policy.
- [x] I have reviewed following Resource Provider guidelines, including
ARM resource provider contract and
REST guidelines (estimated time: 4 hours).
I understand this is required before I can request review from an ARM API Review board.
ARM API changes review
- If you want for the ARM team to review this PR, you must add the
ARMReview
label. - The automation may automatically add the
ARMReview
label, if appropriate.
If this happens, proceed according to guidance given in GitHub comments also added by the automation.
Breaking change review
If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, follow the process outlined in the High-level Breaking Change Process doc.
Getting help
- For guidance on fixing this PR CI check failures, see the hyperlinks provided in given failure and https://aka.ms/ci-fix.
- For additional help, see https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/spectools.
Hi, @ishanjindalms! Thank you for your pull request. To help get your PR merged:
Generated ApiView
comment added to this PR. You can use ApiView to show API versions diff.
Swagger Validation Report
️️✔️
BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] | new version | base version |
---|---|---|
bms.json | 2023-02-01(80d0064) | 2023-02-01(main) |
bms.json | 2023-04-01(80d0064) | 2023-04-01(main) |
️️✔️
Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️🔄
LintDiff inProgress [Detail]
️️✔️
Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️
ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️⚠️
~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
API Test is not triggered due to precheck failure. Check pipeline log for details.
️❌
SwaggerAPIView: 0 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
️️✔️
CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️
TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passed for PoliCheck.
️️✔️
PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
️️✔️
CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for CadlValidation.
️️✔️
TypeSpec Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for TypeSpec Validation.
️️✔️
PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Summary.
Swagger pipeline restarted successfully, please wait for status update in this comment.
Generated ApiView
Language | Package Name | ApiView Link |
---|---|---|
Swagger | Microsoft.RecoveryServices | Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI. |
Go | sdk/resourcemanager/recoveryservices/armrecoveryservicesbackup | Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI. |
Java | azure-resourcemanager-recoveryservicesbackup | Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI. |
.Net | Azure.ResourceManager.RecoveryServicesBackup | Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI. |
JavaScript | @azure/arm-recoveryservicesbackup | Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI. |
Thank you for your contribution ishanjindalms! We will review the pull request and get back to you soon.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Microsoft"
@ishanjindalms please read the following Contributor License Agreement(CLA). If you agree with the CLA, please reply with the following information.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree [company="{your company}"]
Options:
- (default - no company specified) I have sole ownership of intellectual property rights to my Submissions and I am not making Submissions in the course of work for my employer.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree
- (when company given) I am making Submissions in the course of work for my employer (or my employer has intellectual property rights in my Submissions by contract or applicable law). I have permission from my employer to make Submissions and enter into this Agreement on behalf of my employer. By signing below, the defined term “You” includes me and my employer.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Microsoft"
Contributor License Agreement
Please address or respond to feedback from the ARM API reviewer.
When you are ready to continue the ARM API review, please remove the ARMChangesRequested
label.
This will notify the reviewer to have another look.
If the feedback provided needs further discussion, please use this Teams channel to post your questions - aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel.
Please include [ARM Query]
in the title of your question to indicate that it is ARM-related.
@raosuhas we aren't breaking the API behavior for now and just changing the description so our customers are aware