azure-rest-api-specs
azure-rest-api-specs copied to clipboard
[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.Media/Streaming to add version stable/2022-11-01
This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.
ARM API Information (Control Plane)
Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.
Changelog
Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:
- What's the purpose of the update?
- [ ] new service onboarding
- [x] new API version
- [ ] update existing version for new feature
- [ ] update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
- [ ] Other, please clarify
- When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
- When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
- By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.
Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):
- [x] I commit to follow the Breaking Change Policy of "no breaking changes"
- [x] I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
- [x] Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and errors have all been fixed in this PR. How to fix?
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Applicability: :warning:
If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.
- Change to data plane APIs
- Adding new properties
- All removals
Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:
-
[x] Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.
- Adding a new service
- Adding new API(s)
- Adding a new API version -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
-
[x] Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
-
[ ] If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.
NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.
Hi, @StephanieHan Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.
Swagger Validation Report
️🔄
BreakingChange inProgress [Detail]
️⌛
Breaking Change(Cross-Version) pending [Detail]
️⌛
CredScan pending [Detail]
️🔄
LintDiff inProgress [Detail]
️⚠️
Avocado: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
Rule | Message |
---|---|
:warning: MULTIPLE_API_VERSION | The default tag contains multiple API versions swaggers. readme: specification/mediaservices/resource-manager/readme.md tag: specification/mediaservices/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-streaming-2022-11 |
️⌛
ApiReadinessCheck pending [Detail]
️🔄
~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest inProgress [Detail]
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️⌛
PoliCheck pending [Detail]
️️✔️
PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
️🔄
CadlValidation inProgress [Detail]
️⌛
PR Summary pending [Detail]
Swagger Generation Artifacts
️🔄
ApiDocPreview inProgress [Detail]
️⌛
SDK Breaking Change Tracking pending [Detail]
Generated ApiView
Language | Package Name | ApiView Link |
---|---|---|
Go | sdk/resourcemanager/mediaservices/armmediaservices | https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/b34f4afe477544c58025eea7cf4862cf |
JavaScript | @azure/arm-mediaservices | https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/949ecbf093be488fa6df62a4844db5b5 |
/azp run unifiedPipeline
No pipelines are associated with this pull request.
Hi, @StephanieHan your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board([email protected]).
"Status": {
should be modelled as a proxy resource with along with the top level envelope
Refers to: specification/mediaservices/resource-manager/Microsoft.Media/Streaming/stable/2022-11-01/streamingservice.json:2652 in 7ae44c4. [](commit_id = 7ae44c48f8994ed7e3a39407c4482bc95a391c6f, deletion_comment = False)
"/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Media/mediaservices/{accountName}/liveEvents/{liveEventName}/trackIngestHeartbeat": {
resourceCollection names MUST be nouns and plural
Refers to: specification/mediaservices/resource-manager/Microsoft.Media/Streaming/stable/2022-11-01/streamingservice.json:587 in 7ae44c4. [](commit_id = 7ae44c48f8994ed7e3a39407c4482bc95a391c6f, deletion_comment = False)
"StreamEvent": {
model as proxy resource
Refers to: specification/mediaservices/resource-manager/Microsoft.Media/Streaming/stable/2022-11-01/streamingservice.json:2695 in 7ae44c4. [](commit_id = 7ae44c48f8994ed7e3a39407c4482bc95a391c6f, deletion_comment = False)
"additionalProperties": {
is this user defined?
Refers to: specification/mediaservices/resource-manager/Microsoft.Media/Streaming/stable/2022-11-01/streamingservice.json:2709 in 7ae44c4. [](commit_id = 7ae44c48f8994ed7e3a39407c4482bc95a391c6f, deletion_comment = False)
"LiveEventStreamEventsGetResult": {
x-ms-pageable
Refers to: specification/mediaservices/resource-manager/Microsoft.Media/Streaming/stable/2022-11-01/streamingservice.json:2717 in 7ae44c4. [](commit_id = 7ae44c48f8994ed7e3a39407c4482bc95a391c6f, deletion_comment = False)
"LiveEventStatusGetResult": {
x-ms-pageable
Refers to: specification/mediaservices/resource-manager/Microsoft.Media/Streaming/stable/2022-11-01/streamingservice.json:2682 in 7ae44c4. [](commit_id = 7ae44c48f8994ed7e3a39407c4482bc95a391c6f, deletion_comment = False)
"additionalProperties": {
is this user defined?
Refers to: specification/mediaservices/resource-manager/Microsoft.Media/Streaming/stable/2022-11-01/streamingservice.json:2740 in 7ae44c4. [](commit_id = 7ae44c48f8994ed7e3a39407c4482bc95a391c6f, deletion_comment = False)
"LiveEventTrackIngestHeartbeatGetResult": {
x-ms-pageable
Refers to: specification/mediaservices/resource-manager/Microsoft.Media/Streaming/stable/2022-11-01/streamingservice.json:2748 in 7ae44c4. [](commit_id = 7ae44c48f8994ed7e3a39407c4482bc95a391c6f, deletion_comment = False)
"TrackEvent": {
model as proxy resource
Refers to: specification/mediaservices/resource-manager/Microsoft.Media/Streaming/stable/2022-11-01/streamingservice.json:2730 in 7ae44c4. [](commit_id = 7ae44c48f8994ed7e3a39407c4482bc95a391c6f, deletion_comment = False)
"additionalProperties": {
remove all free form objects or provide a justification for why you need it?
In reply to: 1286419741
Refers to: specification/mediaservices/resource-manager/Microsoft.Media/Streaming/stable/2022-11-01/streamingservice.json:2709 in 0b59b3e. [](commit_id = 0b59b3e6849c2d77c77a0a2efa33b3f463ca0c8a, deletion_comment = False)
"operationId": "LiveEvents_TrackIngestHeartbeat",
Please fix the operation names as per the suggestions provided in the lintdiff pipeline evaluation under Checks > ~[Staging] Swagger Lintdiff
Refers to: specification/mediaservices/resource-manager/Microsoft.Media/Streaming/stable/2022-11-01/streamingservice.json:594 in 7ae44c4. [](commit_id = 7ae44c48f8994ed7e3a39407c4482bc95a391c6f, deletion_comment = False)
"operationId": "LiveEvents_TrackIngestHeartbeat",
Please check other warnings there and fix as well
In reply to: 1286422340
Refers to: specification/mediaservices/resource-manager/Microsoft.Media/Streaming/stable/2022-11-01/streamingservice.json:594 in 0b59b3e. [](commit_id = 0b59b3e6849c2d77c77a0a2efa33b3f463ca0c8a, deletion_comment = False)
Please ensure to respond feedbacks from the ARM API reviewer. When you are ready to continue the ARM API review, please remove ARMChangesRequested
"Status": {
should be modelled as a proxy resource with along with the top level envelope
Do we need to model it as a proxy resource even if it's not an ARM resource? Those three new added endpoints are to get some telemetry data of the live event(which is an ARM resource). They are just like the ArmStreamingEndpointSkuInfo
entity (which is not modelled as a proxy resource) which exists already.
In reply to: 1286415766
"additionalProperties": {
remove all free form objects or provide a justification for why you need it?
This is not user defined. We need these free form objects because we have to return different set of data inside the data
field for different eventType
. For example this list will be returned:
[
{
“eventType”: “/StreamEvent/Ingestion/FirstChunkReceived”,
“eventTime”: “2022-04-25T12:01:00.0000”,
“level”: “4”,
“data”: {
“streamid”: “mystream”,
“mediatype”: “video”,
“trackname”: “video”,
“bitrate”: 1600000,
“mediatimestamp”: “6030”,
“duration”: 180000,
“timescale”: 90000,
“resultcode”: “S_OK”
“ResultMessage”: “succeeded”,
“resolution”: “1024x576”
}
},
{
“eventType”: “/StreamEvent/Ingestion/BeginIngest”,
“eventTime”: “2022-04-25T12:00:00.0000”,
“level”: “4”,
“data”: {
“streamname”: “video”,
“resultcode”: “S_OK”
“ResultMessage”: “succeeded”
}
}
]
We'll document what's the data set for each eventType for customers.
In reply to: 1286421118
Hi @StephanieHan, one or multiple validation error/warning suppression(s) is detected in your PR. Please follow the Swagger-Suppression-Process to get approval.
Hi @StephanieHan, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff
. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.
Task | How to fix | Priority |
---|---|---|
Avocado | Fix-Avocado | High |
Semantic validation | Fix-SemanticValidation-Error | High |
Model validation | Fix-ModelValidation-Error | High |
LintDiff | Fix-LintDiff | high |
"/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Media/mediaservices/{accountName}/liveEvents/{liveEventName}/trackIngestHeartbeat": {
resourceCollection names MUST be nouns and plural
How about the name of another one? "/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Media/mediaservices/{accountName}/liveEvents/{liveEventName}/status"
. Is it good to use status
?
In reply to: 1286417977
"/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Media/mediaservices/{accountName}/liveEvents/{liveEventName}/trackIngestHeartbeat": {
resourceCollection names MUST be nouns and plural
How about the name of another one?
"/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Media/mediaservices/{accountName}/liveEvents/{liveEventName}/status"
. Is it good to usestatus
?In reply to: 1286417977
This is kind of the reason I am asking if these calls should be a POST, since they are not returning ARM resources. and might be confusing to the customers.
"/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Media/mediaservices/{accountName}/liveEvents/{liveEventName}/trackIngestHeartbeats": {
Like rkmanda mentioned, please check the lintdiff for this
Refers to: specification/mediaservices/resource-manager/Microsoft.Media/Streaming/stable/2022-11-01/streamingservice.json:593 in aef67ad. [](commit_id = aef67ad340dda57cd4c084983cb71849f8bb6ea0, deletion_comment = False)
/azp run
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).