azure-rest-api-specs
azure-rest-api-specs copied to clipboard
Published
20 hours ago •
Azure
Azure
Add autologger_settings for CI
Add settings to opt-in/out of default mlflow autologger on CIs.
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow. Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.
Changelog
Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:
- What's the purpose of the update?
- [ ] new service onboarding
- [ ] new API version
- [ ] update existing version for new feature
- [ ] update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
- [ ] Other, please clarify
- When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
- When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
- If updating an existing version, please select the specific language SDKs and CLIs that must be refreshed after the swagger is published.
- [ ] SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
- [ ] SDK of Python
- [ ] SDK of Java
- [ ] SDK of Js
- [ ] SDK of Go
- [ ] PowerShell
- [ ] CLI
- [ ] Terraform
- [ ] No refresh required for updates in this PR
Contribution checklist:
- [ ] I commit to follow the Breaking Change Policy of "no breaking changes"
- [ ] I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
- [ ] Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and errors have all been fixed in this PR. How to fix?
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Applicability: :warning:
If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.
- Change to data plane APIs
- Adding new properties
- All removals
Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:
-
[ ] Check this box if any of the following appy to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.
- Adding a new service
- Adding new API(s)
- Adding a new API version -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you are using OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. More details, refer to the wiki.
-
[ ] Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
-
[ ] If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
- [ ] Removing API(s) in a stable version
- [ ] Removing properties in a stable version
- [ ] Removing API version(s) in a stable version
- [ ] Updating API in a stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
- [ ] Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.
Hi, @prakharg-msft Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.
![openapi-workflow-bot[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/81125?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
Swagger Validation Report
️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️⚠️Breaking Change(Cross-Version): 11 Warnings warning [Detail]
| compared swaggers (via Oad v0.9.7)] | new version | base version |
|---|---|---|
| machineLearningServices.json | 2022-10-01-preview(e63412e) | 2022-05-01(main) |
| machineLearningServices.json | 2022-10-01-preview(e63412e) | 2022-06-01-preview(main) |
The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest preview version:
️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
| compared tags (via openapi-validator v1.13.0) | new version | base version |
|---|---|---|
| package-preview-2022-10 | package-preview-2022-10(e63412e) | package-preview-2022-10(dev-machinelearningservices-Microsoft.MachineLearningServices-2022-10-01-preview) |
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
|
Collection object 'AmlComputeNodesInformation' returned by list operation 'Compute_ListNodes' with 'x-ms-pageable' extension, has no property named 'value'. Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L1089 |
| :warning: R1003 - ListInOperationName | Since operation 'QuotasUpdate' response has model definition 'array', it should be of the form 'list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L567 |
| :warning: R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties | Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L3266 |
| :warning: R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties | Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L3368 |
| :warning: R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties | Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L3463 |
| :warning: R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties | Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L3676 |
| :warning: R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties | Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L3875 |
| :warning: R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties | Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L3896 |
| :warning: R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties | Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L3964 |
| :warning: R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties | Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L4007 |
| :warning: R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties | Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L4027 |
| :warning: R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties | Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L4042 |
| :warning: R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties | Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L4312 |
| :warning: R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties | Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L6045 |
| :warning: R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties | Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L6225 |
| :warning: R2029 - PageableOperation | Based on the response model schema, operation 'VirtualMachineSizes_List' might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension. Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L519 |
| :warning: R2029 - PageableOperation | Based on the response model schema, operation 'PrivateLinkResources_List' might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension. Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L1568 |
| :warning: R2029 - PageableOperation | Based on the response model schema, operation 'Workspaces_ListOutboundNetworkDependenciesEndpoints' might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension. Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L1930 |
| :warning: R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames | OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ComputeModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'Compute' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L713 |
| :warning: R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames | OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ComputeModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'Compute' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L759 |
| :warning: R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames | OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ComputeModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'Compute' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L812 |
| :warning: R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames | OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ComputeModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'Compute' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L896 |
| :warning: R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames | OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ComputeModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'Compute' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L950 |
| :warning: R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames | OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ComputeModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'Compute' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L1013 |
| :warning: R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames | OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ComputeModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'Compute' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L1067 |
| :warning: R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames | OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ComputeModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'Compute' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L1159 |
| :warning: R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames | OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ComputeModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'Compute' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L1205 |
| :warning: R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames | OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ComputeModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'Compute' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L1249 |
| :warning: R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames | OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ComputeModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'Compute' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L1293 |
| :warning: R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames | OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'ComputeModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'Compute' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2022-10-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L1336 |
️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
- "https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/e63412ef6f38ccdba3943823a89c269125fddd12/specification/machinelearningservices/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-preview-2022-10">machinelearningservices/resource-manager/readme.md#package-preview-2022-10
️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for CadlValidation.
️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Summary.
![openapi-pipeline-app[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/65541?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
Swagger Generation Artifacts
️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account.
️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Breaking Changes Tracking
️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from cebc48b297f09bea5cf4ed5965ce427c49ca97d0. SDK Automation 14.0.0command pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json warn File azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read command pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json
️✔️Azure.ResourceManager.MachineLearning [View full logs] [Preview SDK Changes]info [Changelog]
️❌ azure-sdk-for-go failed [Detail]
❌Failed [Logs] Generate from cebc48b297f09bea5cf4ed5965ce427c49ca97d0. SDK Automation 14.0.0command sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json command generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] total 1 error(s): cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] failed to execute `go generate` '[33;1mWARNING: Unable to find version for /mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-go/src/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/resourcemanager/machinelearning/armmachinelearning[0m cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] Cannot find go module under resourcemanager/machinelearning/armmachinelearning, try to build in /mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-go/src/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/resourcemanager/machinelearning/armmachinelearning cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] ##[command]Cleaning auto-generated files in /mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-go/src/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/resourcemanager/machinelearning/armmachinelearning cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] ##[command]Executing autorest.go in /mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-go/src/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/resourcemanager/machinelearning/armmachinelearning cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] autorest --version=3.8.2 --use=@autorest/[email protected] --go --track2 --output-folder=/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-go/src/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/resourcemanager/machinelearning/armmachinelearning --clear-output-folder=false --go.clear-output-folder=false --honor-body-placement=true --remove-unreferenced-types=false ./autorest.md cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] AutoRest code generation utility [cli version: 3.6.1; node: v14.20.0] cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] (C) 2018 Microsoft Corporation. cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] https://aka.ms/autorest cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] info | AutoRest core version selected from configuration: 3.8.2. cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] There is a new version of AutoRest available (3.6.2). cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] > You can install the newer version with with npm install -g autorest@latest cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] info | Loading AutoRest core '/home/cloudtest/.autorest/@[email protected]/nodemodules/@autorest/core/dist' (3.8.2) cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] info | Installing AutoRest extension '@autorest/go' (4.0.0-preview.44 -> 4.0.0-preview.44) cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] info | Installed AutoRest extension '@autorest/go' (4.0.0-preview.44->4.0.0-preview.44) cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] info | Installing AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.23.1 -> 4.23.1) cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] info | Installed AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.23.1->4.23.1) cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] fatal | Process() cancelled due to failure cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] error | Error: Operation response '/paths/~1providers~1Microsoft.MachineLearningServices~1operations/get/responses/200' produces type couldn't be resolved. Operation is probably is missing a produces field and there isn't any global value. Please add "produces": [<contentType>]" cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] error | Autorest completed with an error. If you think the error message is unclear, or is a bug, please declare an issues at https://github.com/Azure/autorest/issues with the error message you are seeing. cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] ##[error]Error running autorest.go cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] build.go:5: running "pwsh": exit status 1 cmderr [generator automation-v2] [ERROR] ': exit status 1 error Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-sdk-for-go/src/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go]: generator automation-v2 warn Skip package processing as generation is failed
️❌ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 failed [Detail]
❌Failed [Logs] Generate from cebc48b297f09bea5cf4ed5965ce427c49ca97d0. SDK Automation 14.0.0command sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json cmderr [automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed. command sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json cmderr [automation_generate.sh] cmderr [automation_generate.sh] npm notice New minor version of npm available! 8.15.0 -> 8.19.2 cmderr [automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v8.19.2> cmderr [automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g [email protected]` to update! cmderr [automation_generate.sh] npm notice cmdout [automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] info | Installing AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.23.5 -> 4.23.5) cmdout [automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] info | Installed AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.23.5->4.23.5) cmdout [automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] info | Installing AutoRest extension '@autorest/python' (6.1.6 -> 6.1.6) cmdout [automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] info | Installed AutoRest extension '@autorest/python' (6.1.6->6.1.6) cmdout [automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] fatal | Process() cancelled due to failure cmdout [automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] error | Error: Operation response '/paths/~1providers~1Microsoft.MachineLearningServices~1operations/get/responses/200' produces type couldn't be resolved. Operation is probably is missing a produces field and there isn't any global value. Please add "produces": [<contentType>]" cmdout [automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] error | Autorest completed with an error. If you think the error message is unclear, or is a bug, please declare an issues at https://github.com/Azure/autorest/issues with the error message you are seeing. cmdout [automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] cmdout [automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] info | Loading AutoRest core '/home/cloudtest/.autorest/@[email protected]/nodemodules/@autorest/core/dist' (3.8.4) cmdout [automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] info | Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.23.5->4.23.5) cmdout [automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] info | Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/python' (6.1.6->6.1.6) cmdout [automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] fatal | Process() cancelled due to failure cmdout [automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] error | Error: Operation response '/paths/~1providers~1Microsoft.MachineLearningServices~1operations/get/responses/200' produces type couldn't be resolved. Operation is probably is missing a produces field and there isn't any global value. Please add "produces": [<contentType>]" cmdout [automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] error | Autorest completed with an error. If you think the error message is unclear, or is a bug, please declare an issues at https://github.com/Azure/autorest/issues with the error message you are seeing. cmdout [automation_generate.sh] [Autorest]/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/venv-sdk/auto_temp.json does not exist!!!Error happened during codegen error Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-sdk-for-python]: sh scripts/automation_generate.sh warn Skip package processing as generation is failed
️❌ azure-sdk-for-java failed [Detail]
❌Failed [Logs] Generate from cebc48b297f09bea5cf4ed5965ce427c49ca97d0. SDK Automation 14.0.0command ./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json command ./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
❌azure-resourcemanager-machinelearning [View full logs] [Preview SDK Changes]
️❌ azure-sdk-for-js failed [Detail]
❌Failed [Logs] Generate from cebc48b297f09bea5cf4ed5965ce427c49ca97d0. SDK Automation 14.0.0command sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json warn File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read command sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json cmderr [automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] An error occurred while generating codes for readme file: "specification/machinelearningservices/resource-manager/readme.md": cmderr [automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] Err: Error: Command failed: autorest --version=3.8.4 --typescript --modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication --azure-arm --head-as-boolean=true --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --generate-test --typescript-sdks-folder=/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-js ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/machinelearningservices/resource-manager/readme.md --use=@autorest/[email protected] cmderr [automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] Stderr: "null" cmderr [automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] Stdout: "null" cmderr [automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] ErrorStack: "Error: Command failed: autorest --version=3.8.4 --typescript --modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication --azure-arm --head-as-boolean=true --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --generate-test --typescript-sdks-folder=/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-js ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/machinelearningservices/resource-manager/readme.md --use=@autorest/[email protected] cmderr [automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] at checkExecSyncError (child_process.js:790:11) cmderr [automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] at Object.execSync (child_process.js:863:15) cmderr [automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] at Object.<anonymous> (/opt/hostedtoolcache/node/14.20.0/x64/lib/node_modules/@azure-tools/js-sdk-release-tools/dist/hlc/generateMgmt.js:39:33) cmderr [automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] at Generator.next (<anonymous>) cmderr [automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] at /opt/hostedtoolcache/node/14.20.0/x64/lib/node_modules/@azure-tools/js-sdk-release-tools/node_modules/tslib/tslib.js:115:75 cmderr [automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] at new Promise (<anonymous>) cmderr [automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] at Object.__awaiter (/opt/hostedtoolcache/node/14.20.0/x64/lib/node_modules/@azure-tools/js-sdk-release-tools/node_modules/tslib/tslib.js:111:16) cmderr [automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] at Object.generateMgmt (/opt/hostedtoolcache/node/14.20.0/x64/lib/node_modules/@azure-tools/js-sdk-release-tools/dist/hlc/generateMgmt.js:20:20) cmderr [automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] at /opt/hostedtoolcache/node/14.20.0/x64/lib/node_modules/@azure-tools/js-sdk-release-tools/dist/autoGenerateInPipeline.js:34:34 cmderr [automation_generate.sh] [ERROR] at Generator.next (<anonymous>)" error Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-sdk-for-js]: sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh warn Skip package processing as generation is failed
️❌ azure-resource-manager-schemas failed [Detail]
❌Failed [Logs] Generate from cebc48b297f09bea5cf4ed5965ce427c49ca97d0. Schema Automation 14.0.0command .sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json cmderr [initScript.sh] WARN old lockfile cmderr [initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm, cmderr [initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry. cmderr [initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile cmderr [initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient... cmderr [initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile warn File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read command .sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
❌machinelearningservices/resource-manager [View full logs] [Preview Schema Changes]
️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]
❌Failed [Logs] Generate from cebc48b297f09bea5cf4ed5965ce427c49ca97d0. SDK Automation 14.0.0command sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json command pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
❌Az.machinelearningservices [View full logs] [Preview SDK Changes]
Swagger pipeline restarted successfully. If there is ApiView generated, it will be updated in this comment.
Hi @prakharg-msft, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.
| Task | How to fix | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| Avocado | Fix-Avocado | High |
| Semantic validation | Fix-SemanticValidation-Error | High |
| Model validation | Fix-ModelValidation-Error | High |
| LintDiff | Fix-LintDiff | high |
Hi, @prakharg-msft. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.
Hi, @prakharg-msft your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board([email protected]).