azure-rest-api-specs icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
azure-rest-api-specs copied to clipboard

[Maps - RevGeoCoding] Add version preview/2022-12-01-preview [Hub Generated]

Open john35452 opened this issue 1 year ago • 14 comments

This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.

Data Plane API - Pull Request

API Info: The Basics

Most of the information about your service should be captured in the issue that serves as your engagement record.

  • Link to engagement record issue:

Is this review for (select one):

  • [ ] a private preview
  • [ ] a public preview
  • [ ] GA release

Change Scope

This section will help us focus on the specific parts of your API that are new or have been modified.
Please share a link to the design document for the new APIs, a link to the previous Open API document (swagger) if applicable, and the root paths that have been updated.

  • Design Document:
  • Previous Open API Doc:
  • Updated paths:

❔Got questions? Need additional info?? We are here to help!

Contact us!

The Azure API Review Board is dedicated to helping you create amazing APIs. You can read about our mission and learn more about our process on our wiki.

Click here for links to tools, specs, guidelines & other good stuff

Tooling

Guidelines & Specifications

Helpful Links

john35452 avatar Jul 26 '22 10:07 john35452

Hi, @john35452 Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?
  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️⚠️Breaking Change(Cross-Version): 10 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.2)] new version base version
    search.json 2022-12-01-preview(2b28c3e) 2022-09-01-preview(main)

    The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest preview version:

    Rule Message
    :warning: 1005 - RemovedPath The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/geocode/batch' removed or restructured?
    Old: Search/preview/2022-09-01-preview/search.json#L376:5
    :warning: 1007 - RemovedClientParameter The new version is missing a client parameter that was found in the old version. Was 'ResultType' removed or renamed?
    New: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L44:3
    Old: Search/preview/2022-09-01-preview/search.json#L44:3
    :warning: 1017 - ReferenceRedirection The '$ref' property points to different models in the old and new versions.
    New: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L1024:9
    Old: Search/preview/2022-09-01-preview/search.json#L777:9
    :warning: 1017 - ReferenceRedirection The '$ref' property points to different models in the old and new versions.
    New: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L913:9
    Old: Search/preview/2022-09-01-preview/search.json#L668:9
    :warning: 1027 - DefaultValueChanged The new version has a different default value than the previous one.
    New: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L300:9
    Old: Search/preview/2022-09-01-preview/search.json#L244:9
    :warning: 1027 - DefaultValueChanged The new version has a different default value than the previous one.
    New: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L53:5
    Old: Search/preview/2022-09-01-preview/search.json#L53:5
    :warning: 1047 - XmsEnumChanged The new version has a different x-ms-enum 'name' than the previous one.
    New: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L1024:9
    Old: Search/preview/2022-09-01-preview/search.json#L777:9
    :warning: 1047 - XmsEnumChanged The new version has a different x-ms-enum 'name' than the previous one.
    New: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L968:9
    Old: Search/preview/2022-09-01-preview/search.json#L720:9
    :warning: 1047 - XmsEnumChanged The new version has a different x-ms-enum 'name' than the previous one.
    New: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L492:9
    Old: Search/preview/2022-09-01-preview/search.json#L436:9
    :warning: 1047 - XmsEnumChanged The new version has a different x-ms-enum 'name' than the previous one.
    New: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L913:9
    Old: Search/preview/2022-09-01-preview/search.json#L668:9
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 13 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.0.0) new version base version
    package-preview-2022-12 package-preview-2022-12(2b28c3e) default(main)

    [must fix]The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:

    Rule Message Related RPC [For API reviewers]
    :warning: PaginationResponse Operation might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L433
    :warning: ErrorResponse Error response should contain a x-ms-error-code header.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L474
    :warning: ErrorResponse The error property in the error response schema should be required.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L474
    :warning: ErrorResponse Error schema should define code and message properties as required.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L474
    :warning: PaginationResponse Operation might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L541
    :warning: ErrorResponse Error response should contain a x-ms-error-code header.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L588
    :warning: ErrorResponse The error property in the error response schema should be required.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L588
    :warning: ErrorResponse Error schema should define code and message properties as required.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L588
    :warning: PaginationResponse Operation might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L595
    :warning: ErrorResponse Error response should contain a x-ms-error-code header.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L636
    :warning: ErrorResponse The error property in the error response schema should be required.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L636
    :warning: ErrorResponse Error schema should define code and message properties as required.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L636
    :warning: AvoidNestedProperties Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L988


    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Rule Message
    :warning: PaginationResponse Operation might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L280
    :warning: ErrorResponse Error response should contain a x-ms-error-code header.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L426
    :warning: ErrorResponse The error property in the error response schema should be required.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L426
    :warning: ErrorResponse Error schema should define code and message properties as required.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L426
    :warning: ErrorResponse Error response should contain a x-ms-error-code header.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L534
    :warning: ErrorResponse The error property in the error response schema should be required.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L534
    :warning: ErrorResponse Error schema should define code and message properties as required.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L534
    :warning: SchemaDescriptionOrTitle Schema should have a description or title.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L644
    :warning: SchemaDescriptionOrTitle Schema should have a description or title.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L906
    :warning: SchemaDescriptionOrTitle Schema should have a description or title.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L959
    :warning: SchemaDescriptionOrTitle Schema should have a description or title.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L965
    :warning: PropertyDescription Property should have a description.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L988
    :warning: AvoidNestedProperties Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L990
    :warning: PropertyDescription Property should have a description.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L990
    :warning: PropertyDescription Property should have a description.
    Location: Search/preview/2022-12-01-preview/search.json#L1076
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️❌~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 1 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    Rule Message
    Error "\nfatal error: ENOENT: no such file or directory,
    open '/mnt/vss/_work/1/azure-rest-api-specs/specification/maps/data-plane/Search/readme.test.md',
    "errno":-2,
    "code":"ENOENT",
    "syscall":"open",
    "path":"/mnt/vss/_work/1/azure-rest-api-specs/specification/maps/data-plane/Search/readme.test.md"\n"
    ️️✔️~[Staging] SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️~[Staging] CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Summary.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    Swagger pipeline restarted successfully, please wait for status update in this comment.

    Hi @john35452, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.

    TaskHow to fixPriority
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHigh
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHigh
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHigh
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhigh
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback.

    Swagger pipeline started successfully. If there is ApiView generated, it will be updated in this comment.

    Swagger pipeline started successfully. If there is ApiView generated, it will be updated in this comment.

    Swagger pipeline started successfully. If there is ApiView generated, it will be updated in this comment.

    Swagger pipeline restarted successfully. If there is ApiView generated, it will be updated in this comment.

    Hi, @john35452. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    ghost avatar Sep 25 '22 16:09 ghost

    Sorry for the last minute update. After discussion with our PM, we would like to change parameter location to coordinates to make the location pair input naming consistent among Azure Map APIs.

    john35452 avatar Oct 12 '22 03:10 john35452

    Hi, @john35452. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    ghost avatar Oct 30 '22 16:10 ghost

    Hi, @john35452. The PR will be closed since the PR has no update for 28 days. If you still need the PR review to proceed, please reopen it and @ mention PR assignee.

    ghost avatar Nov 18 '22 05:11 ghost

    Hi, @john35452. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    ghost avatar Dec 25 '22 16:12 ghost

    Hi @john35452 This PR was flagged for attempting to introduce a new RP namespace to the main branch without first merging the new RP to the RPSaaSMaster branch. Please add the new RP in a merge to RPSaaSMaster before continuing the merge to main.

    @mikekistler if this is good can you please update the appropriate labels?

    jhendrixMSFT avatar Jan 12 '23 18:01 jhendrixMSFT

    Could I get one more API Steward to review/approve this PR? @markweitzel @JeffreyRichter @johanste @tg-msft @stewartadam ?

    mikekistler avatar Jan 13 '23 03:01 mikekistler

    Could I get one more API Steward to review/approve this PR?

    Wanted to ack this, won't be able to today but will get a review in tomorrow.

    stewartadam avatar Jan 17 '23 23:01 stewartadam

    Really appreciate for the reviews from @mikekistler and @stewartadam . @jhendrixMSFT Could you help me to merge this PR? Thanks a lot for all your help here.

    john35452 avatar Jan 19 '23 02:01 john35452