feat: Don't set feature gate CustomCPUCFSQuotaPeriod, Get them from kubelet configs

[gaopenghigh]

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Currently, if CPUCFSQuotaPeriod are set in CustomKubeletConfigs, agent baker set feature gates "CustomCPUCFSQuotaPeriod =true", this PR removes this logic since the feature gate is already set by RP.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Requirements:

• [ ] uses conventional commit messages
• [ ] includes documentation
• [ ] adds unit tests
• [ ] tested upgrade from previous version

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

none

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9966808887

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-0.02%) to 71.005%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 9966582612:	-0.02%
Covered Lines:	2564
Relevant Lines:	3611

---

💛 - Coveralls

[cameronmeissner]

we should probably wait on merging on this until the RP change has rolled out to all regions, otherwise we'll risk those feature gates not getting properly set

[cameronmeissner]

also we don't generally link to ADO PRs and things of that nature here since this is OSS :)

[gaopenghigh]

Yes this one should wait for the RP change.

[gaopenghigh]

The RP change has already rolled out to all regions, now we can merge this, @cameronmeissner could you help to review again?

[cameronmeissner]

The RP change has already rolled out to all regions, now we can merge this, @cameronmeissner could you help to review again?

do we still want/need to merge this?

[gaopenghigh]

The RP change has already rolled out to all regions, now we can merge this, @cameronmeissner could you help to review again?

do we still want/need to merge this?

Hi @cameronmeissner yes it's still needed.