aztec-packages
aztec-packages copied to clipboard
AztecProtocol
Currently, only the members of the committee will be re-executing the block to checks its correctness as part of block production. This means that full nodes and non-committee members are...
Not sure why, but couldn't make a smaller repro (maybe related to many inputs in the witness?) of a failure I was seeing in `nargo execute` with correct inputs. Repro:...
It should also check L1, not just its p2p history when deciding to slash.
We want to slash validators that are not participating in consensus.
when an epoch is not proven and we can't get the data, need to slash the committee.
if and epoch was pruned and we can get the data and it is valid, need to slash the committee
if we see a block which is proposed that lies about state roots, slash the proposer.
when an epoch is proven, need to look back and collect stats based on how validators performed, using both p2p and L1 data. We should slash validators who did not...
### What are you trying to do? `aztec test --package my_project` fails with `error: a value is required for '--package ' but none was supplied` Running aztec-cli with tracing enabled...
Follow up to https://github.com/AztecProtocol/aztec-packages/pull/12199, since we never did introduce the check suggested in [this comment](https://github.com/AztecProtocol/aztec-packages/pull/12199#pullrequestreview-2636387357) and we want to avoid surpising errors when transactions are simply deemed invalid due to...
