Checkout: Hide edit button when only one payment method exists

[jjchrisdiehl]

This is a follow up PR to #90240

In #90240 we added the credit amount to the WordPressFreePurchaseSummary component to make the amount more obvious.

In this PR we are hiding the edit button for the Payment Method step if the step only contains one payment method - because editing a list of one isn't really possible.

Related to #88863

Before	After

Proposed Changes

• Hide the stepper's HeaderEditButton for the Payment Method step when - 1) the paymentMethodStepIsActive 2) the paymentMethods array has a length of 1 or less

Testing Instructions

Regular purchases

• Add a renewal to your shopping cart, ensure the cart has valid payment methods
• Go to the Payment Method step and ensure that you see an edit link to change your payment method
• Make sure you can change methods via the edit link

Credit purchases

• Next, add enough credit to your account to cover the purchase completely
• Refresh checkout and go to Payment method step, it should show WordPress.com Credits $x.xx
• At this point there should not be an edit link next to the payment method step, but, there should be an edit link next to Billing Information
• Try to find some combination that breaks this PR

[github-actions[bot]]

Calypso Live (direct link)

https://calypso.live?image=registry.a8c.com/calypso/app:build-106580

Jetpack Cloud live (direct link)

https://calypso.live?image=registry.a8c.com/calypso/app:build-106580&env=jetpack

Automattic for Agencies live (direct link)

https://calypso.live?image=registry.a8c.com/calypso/app:build-106580&env=a8c-for-agencies

[matticbot]

Here is how your PR affects size of JS and CSS bundles shipped to the user's browser:

Sections (~27 bytes added 📈 [gzipped])

name                          parsed_size           gzip_size
site-purchases                      +67 B  (+0.0%)      +27 B  (+0.0%)
purchases                           +67 B  (+0.0%)      +27 B  (+0.0%)
jetpack-cloud-partner-portal        +67 B  (+0.0%)      +27 B  (+0.0%)
checkout                            +67 B  (+0.0%)      +27 B  (+0.0%)
a8c-for-agencies-purchases          +67 B  (+0.0%)      +27 B  (+0.0%)

Sections contain code specific for a given set of routes. Is downloaded and parsed only when a particular route is navigated to.

Async-loaded Components (~27 bytes added 📈 [gzipped])

name                                             parsed_size           gzip_size
async-load-calypso-my-sites-checkout-modal             +67 B  (+0.0%)      +27 B  (+0.0%)
async-load-calypso-blocks-editor-checkout-modal        +67 B  (+0.0%)      +27 B  (+0.0%)

React components that are loaded lazily, when a certain part of UI is displayed for the first time.

Legend

What is parsed and gzip size?

Parsed Size: Uncompressed size of the JS and CSS files. This much code needs to be parsed and stored in memory. Gzip Size: Compressed size of the JS and CSS files. This much data needs to be downloaded over network.

Generated by performance advisor bot at iscalypsofastyet.com.

[jjchrisdiehl]

Remember that the "Edit" button doesn't just allow changing the payment method, it also allows editing the options of the active payment method.

That is a good point 🤔

What happens if a payment method doesn't have an inactive UI at all? Does it re-use the active UI? I can't remember. If so, maybe you could just remove the inactive UI from the credits payment method and hide the edit button if there is no inactive UI.

It looks like if inactiveContent is undefined we would end up just showing nothing rather than falling through to the activeContent RadioButton component.

I wonder if it makes more sense to just explicitly set which payment methods should not show the edit button based on the ones we know show up by themselves?

[sirbrillig]

I wonder if it makes more sense to just explicitly set which payment methods should not show the edit button based on the ones we know show up by themselves?

Yeah, that's one way to do it. Some sort of property on the payment method object maybe?

Either that or the suggestion I made above: re-use the activeContent if no inactiveContent exists and hide the edit button only then.

[jjchrisdiehl]

This has been deprioritized for the time being as I'll be away until July 8th. Feel free to pick it up, otherwise I'll get it completed when I return.

[michaeldcain]

@jjchrisdiehl this seems like a lower-priority improvement, but still a quick fix. I'm moving it back to "In Progress" on the Shilling board, but if you don't have time to work on it, you might want to close it.