meeting-notes icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
meeting-notes copied to clipboard

[Snyk] Fix for 5 vulnerabilities

Open r0yfire opened this issue 1 year ago • 3 comments

User description

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `pip` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • requirements.txt
⚠️ Warning
botocore 1.29.165 has requirement urllib3<1.27,>=1.25.4, but you have urllib3 2.0.7.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

By pinning:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Upgrade Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
medium severity 554/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 6.8
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
SNYK-PYTHON-CERTIFI-3164749
certifi:
2021.10.8 -> 2023.7.22
No No Known Exploit
critical severity 704/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 9.8
Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust
SNYK-PYTHON-CERTIFI-5805047
certifi:
2021.10.8 -> 2023.7.22
No No Known Exploit
medium severity 499/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.7
Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-PYTHON-PROTOBUF-3031740
protobuf:
3.17.3 -> 3.18.3
No No Known Exploit
medium severity 509/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.9
Timing Attack
SNYK-PYTHON-RSA-1038401
rsa:
4.5 -> 4.7
No No Known Exploit
medium severity 509/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.9
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-PYTHON-SETUPTOOLS-3180412
setuptools:
44.1.1 -> 65.5.1
No No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information: 🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)


Type

bug_fix


Description

This PR addresses multiple security vulnerabilities by pinning the versions of certifi, protobuf, rsa, and setuptools in requirements.txt. The changes ensure that the project dependencies are updated to versions that are not affected by the reported vulnerabilities. This is a critical security fix to mitigate potential risks associated with the vulnerabilities in the mentioned packages.


Changes walkthrough

Relevant files
Bug fix
requirements.txt
Pin Dependencies to Resolve Vulnerabilities                           

requirements.txt

  • Pinned certifi to >=2023.7.22 to fix a vulnerability.
  • Pinned protobuf to >=3.18.3 to fix a vulnerability.
  • Pinned rsa to >=4.7 to fix a vulnerability.
  • Pinned setuptools to >=65.5.1 to fix a vulnerability.
  • +5/-1     

    PR-Agent usage: Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    r0yfire avatar Feb 24 '24 16:02 r0yfire

    PR Description updated to latest commit (https://github.com/AutohostAI/meeting-notes/commit/85bec4c25e5833fe374d58c49727e0d62dbd908c)

    PR Review

         PR feedback                    
    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    1, because the PR involves straightforward changes to the requirements.txt file to address specific vulnerabilities. The changes are clear and involve version pinning of dependencies.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    🔍 Possible issues
    • The warning about botocore and urllib3 version conflict might still need to be addressed, as it could lead to incompatibility issues or unexpected behavior in runtime.
    🔒 Security concerns

    No


    ✨ Review tool usage guide:

    Overview: The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR. When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

    /review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...
    

    With a configuration file, use the following template:

    [pr_reviewer]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    
    Utilizing extra instructions

    The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

    Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

    Examples for extra instructions:

    [pr_reviewer] # /review #
    extra_instructions="""
    In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following:
    - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
    - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
    - Is the code logic efficient?
    ...
    """
    

    Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

    How to enable\disable automation
    • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
    pr_commands = ["/review", ...]
    

    meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

    Auto-labels

    The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

    • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
    • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
    Extra sub-tools

    The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, and more.

    Auto-approve PRs

    By invoking:

    /review auto_approve
    

    The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval.

    To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following:

    [pr_reviewer]
    enable_auto_approval = true
    

    (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository)

    You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the estimated_review_effort is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag:

    [pr_reviewer]
    maximal_review_effort = 5
    
    More PR-Agent commands

    To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

    • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
    • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
    • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
    • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
    • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
    • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
    • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
    • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

    See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

    See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    PR Code Suggestions

    Suggestions                                                                                                                                                     
    best practice
    Add an upper version bound for certifi to prevent potential future compatibility issues.

    Consider specifying an upper bound for the certifi version to ensure compatibility with
    your project's dependencies and avoid potential breaking changes in future certifi
    versions.

    requirements.txt [9]

    -certifi>=2023.7.22 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
    +certifi>=2023.7.22,<2024.0 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
     
    
    Add an upper version limit for protobuf to ensure stability.    

    Specify an upper bound for the protobuf version to avoid unexpected breaking changes that
    could arise from future major updates.

    requirements.txt [10]

    -protobuf>=3.18.3 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
    +protobuf>=3.18.3,<4.0 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
     
    
    Limit the rsa version to prevent future incompatibilities.      

    It's recommended to define an upper version limit for rsa to safeguard against breaking
    changes in new major versions.

    requirements.txt [11]

    -rsa>=4.7 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
    +rsa>=4.7,<5.0 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
     
    
    Introduce an upper bound for setuptools to maintain compatibility.

    Adding an upper version constraint for setuptools can help avoid unexpected issues due to
    incompatible updates.

    requirements.txt [12]

    -setuptools>=65.5.1 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
    +setuptools>=65.5.1,<66.0 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
     
    

    ✨ Improve tool usage guide:

    Overview: The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR. When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

    /improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...
    

    With a configuration file, use the following template:

    [pr_code_suggestions]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    
    Enabling\disabling automation

    When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is:

    pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]
    

    meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

    Utilizing extra instructions

    Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.

    Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.

    Examples for extra instructions:

    [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
    extra_instructions="""
    Emphasize the following aspects:
    - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
    - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
    - Is the code logic efficient?
    ...
    """
    

    Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

    A note on code suggestions quality
    • While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
    • Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
    • Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions :gem: tool
    • With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
    More PR-Agent commands

    To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

    • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
    • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
    • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
    • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
    • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
    • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
    • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
    • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

    See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

    See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.