Additional `CODEOWNERS` subteams

[BrandonPacewic]

Current behaviour for new codeowner file:

• @HunterBarclay Now auto requested for review on every change.
• Changes in /exporter/, /fission/src/aps/, /fission/src/mirabuf/, /fission/src/proto/, and /installer/ auto request to @Autodesk/fusion.
• Changes in fission/src/ui/components/ and fission/**/*.css (all .css files in /fission/ auto request to @PepperLola @LucaHaverty (current "ui" framework people).
• All other changes that are not for files specified above will reach the fallback pattern of @autodesk/synthesis-devs (@HunterBarclay will still be requested).

This is not final and I would appreciate any and all name suggestions for the teams.

Currently they are:

• fission currently corresponds to general feature development.
• fusion currently corresponds to the exporter and other cross platform "integration" things.
• Currently no UI team, currently specifying @PepperLola and @LucaHaverty as the reviewers on just the reusable UI components.

[PepperLola]

Is our fusion team blocking anyone else at Autodesk from using that team name, and could that be an issue going forward?

[BrandonPacewic]

Is our fusion team blocking anyone else at Autodesk from using that team name, and could that be an issue going forward?

Well this would only affect the open source Autodesk organization. They won't use this team name internally because they have a internal closed-source organization called fusion already.