Aurea
Aurea
Also, in your example, isn't `generator` just a synchronous method that returns an object, and `next` (or `asyncNext` or whatever) is the actual asynchronous call?
Thanks, this would be useful to have in the standard library indeed. There are a couple of high-level comments I have (I haven't yet looked through all of the implementation):...
Regarding attribution, there is an example of this in some of the map implementations, e.g. [`IntMap` on C#](https://github.com/HaxeFoundation/haxe/blob/development/std/cs/_std/haxe/ds/IntMap.hx#L27-L33). I don't know if the "copyright goes to" language makes sense seeing...
Haxe correctly complains when the expression `A("") == B(0)` is found. However, it only sees such an expression if the analyser runs, because it inlines the `f1` and `f2` variables....
Might have something to do with flushing stdout maybe?
@RealyUniqueName Seems like a resurgence of https://github.com/HaxeFoundation/haxe/issues/10110
The docs are a bit wonky in places, but this can be cleaned up later.
> I just wonder, what would be the technical implications to not use an `async/await` terminology instead of callbacks? Haxe will be getting both asys (an API similar to this...
> That PR was the first attempt to design the API. It's based on signals. That's not entirely true. E.g. the basic filesystem class is callback based, just like here....
@simn Is it not just the conflict in `tests/runci/targets/Php.hx` that must be resolved (e.g. by merge) before the CI can run?