AssassinTee

> This is a big feature. DDNet seems to be doing bad with big features being added. Are you still interested in working on this? Yes I am, I just...

I added the advancement i made for ddnet, where this is already pushed, here, too.

> If we don't want them, it should be consistent that we don't get it. I discussed this issue with heinrich a bit more in detail in discord, but here...

> can you reproduce it, or was it "random"? haven't parsed the crash log yet It was random, I don't know what I did or how to reproduce it, I...

> Sounds sensible in theory, but it's a backcompat hazard. Not sure how one would solve that. That's why I added the alternative solutions, which are not backcompat hazards

@heinrich5991 I have a working branch, but I need to split it up in small digestable units that are reviable. This is my biggest problem currently. I want to work...

```python phone_numbers = [ "2404 9099130", "024049099130", "02404 9099130", "02404/9099130", "+492404 9099130", "+4924049099130", "+492404/9099130", "0160 123456789", "0160/123456789", "+32160 123456789", "Tel.: 0160 123456789" ] for i, number in enumerate(phone_numbers): print(f"{i}: {text_cleaner.transform(number)}")...


@furo321 Thank you very much! This was very fast

> > (missing) features > > remain unimplemented which for me still look like QoL we'd want - maybe make it a new issue or reopen this with a new...