Arthur van de Vondervoort

Version [v0.30.16](https://github.com/StefanMaron/BusinessCentral.LinterCop/releases/tag/v0.30.16) of the LinterCop is now released. Is it possible to verify of the issue is now resolved?

Thank you @jwikman for the detailed description and example, this was of great help! This should now be resolved in the (pre)release version of [v0.30.20](https://github.com/StefanMaron/BusinessCentral.LinterCop/releases/tag/v0.30.20) of the LinterCop.

Version [v0.30.20](https://github.com/StefanMaron/BusinessCentral.LinterCop/releases/tag/v0.30.20) of the LinterCop is now released.

If i understand correctly, if we mark both fields, that we are aware that the Field Names aren't matching, the rule no longer should raise on the `TransferFields` line where...

There's already an check in place for the `ShowCaption` property, so the rule shouldn't be raised. I'm having trouble to reproduce this, because with the examples below the LC0016 diagnostic...

I'm having trouble to reproduce this. A copy of your example doesn't thrown an warning for me 🤔  Can you very you have the latest LinterCop.dll (0.30.19.0) version? %userprofile%\.vscode\extensions\ms-dynamics-smb.al-13.0.1007491\bin\Analyzers...

> Maybe we can get the pragmas during analysis (the same way we get leading/trailing comments), and if there's a pragma to silence this rule, it could skip adding the...

| Id | Title | Raises On | | -- | -- | -- | | LC0044 | Conflicting ID, Name or Type with Table '{0}' | Field in Table(Ext)...

Thank you @tinestaric for sharing a the proof of concept code, this was very helpfull! In the (pre)release version of [v0.30.12](https://github.com/StefanMaron/BusinessCentral.LinterCop/releases/tag/v0.30.12) of the LinterCop the rule will now detect if...

The version [v0.30.12](https://github.com/StefanMaron/BusinessCentral.LinterCop/releases/tag/v0.30.12) of the LinterCop is now released. @pri-kise, can you confirm this is working for you?