Mark Bakhit

@samwillis @jacobdr On a similar note as this issue, does you plan to re-start the workflows for `nodejs-bin` release publishing? Looks like the workflows stopped sometime around node v18. We'd...

For environment specific libraries like this one, I recommend re-running tests per environment. It would likely require a fairly large text matrix though. For example, for ReactPy we [run each...

Perhaps I'm reading the results wrong, but it looks like the results suggest that using standard lib with `asyncio.run_in_executor` is more performant that both `aiofiles` and `aiofile`?

Okay I am seeing an issue with the testing methodology. Fundamentally, all Python async file frameworks will perform **slower for small reads/writes**. This is because they add multiple additional layers...

@sarahboyce Can you give some clarification on what "unexpected results" you are seeing with the current implementation?

Thanks for the clarification. Working on getting it merged within [`ServeStatic`](https://github.com/Archmonger/ServeStatic), a fork of WhiteNoise for continued maintenance and feature updates. To leave some breadcrumbs just incase the WhiteNoise maintainers...

If anyone wants to PR [ServeStatic](https://github.com/Archmonger/ServeStatic), I would support merging any PR that adds a management command to pre-populate the known files via the Django manifest. EDIT: Ended up PRing...

@marksie1988 I created this issue to explain a maintainable way we could create async support in the future.

It would be best to also mention `PipelineManifestStorage` should be used instead, in my opinion.

The current changes are fine with me. But, it doesn't look like the docs were ever rebuilt after merging that PR. This issue should remain open until a docs rebuild.