Mark Bakhit

I don't think it should be a common dependency, solely because reactpy can be installed without specifying any backends. But I do think Uvicorn should be our default webserver for...

We should do this ASAP

How about this and https://github.com/reactive-python/reactpy/issues/993 for 2.0? That's our two big breaking changes. 3.0 can be the new JS interface.

Let's schedule a meeting to talk through this interface and run some simulated development scenarios.

We forgot to talk about how this bind API will play into the build system

Not only that, but the nodsjs-bin PyPi package seems perfect for us to use for ReactPy Build.

@himself65 That feature currently doesn't exist. If we developed some sort of compiling step, is it technically possible that feature could exist in the future. Especially since we've already proven...

@rmorshea [This issue](https://github.com/reactive-python/reactpy/discussions/980#discussioncomment-5975125) has reminded me that we probably want to flesh this out soon. It's going to be confusing as hell to new users that `class` is `class_name`, especially...

Tangentially related - https://github.com/reactive-python/reactpy/issues/647

The name `use_channel` kind of implies that multiple channels and/or channel groups can be defined per component. Here's some other potential names - use_data_message - use_message - use_messenger - use_message_listener...