More Useful Hosting Providers Page

[kakduman]

Can we reorganize the hosting providers page in a more methodical format? I was thinking an organization similar to the following:

4 price points: $5, $10, $20, $40 Tier system: either 6 tiers (S, A, B, C, D, F), 5 tiers (A, B, C, D, F), 4 tiers (Gold, Silver, Bronze, None OR A, B , C, F), 3 tiers (Good / OK / Bad OR Gold / Silver / Bronze). Any hosts which have not been reviewed in an unbiased fashion would be put in the "awaiting review" section. More standardization: See how a host does in terms of the following:

• affordability
• speed
• support
• reputation
• niche features

An example format might look like this:

Price point A ($5/mo)

Gold

• Host A's (budget 4GB US plan or budget 5GB EU plan)

Silver

• Host B's (premium 1GB plan)

Bronze

• Host C (budget 2GB plan)

None

• Host D (premium 10GB plan)

The best plans from each host for that price point are placed in parentheses

[RemagOfficial]

i would do 5 price points and have an unlimited budget option to show what a very large budget can provide

[JustDoom]

some things could be different between people, like support

[JustDoom]

theres this i guess https://github.com/SpiritenHasArrived/MC/blob/main/Server_Side/server_hosts.md

[JustDoom]

I think if we did it from performance and price then we could eventually add it