Groups/channels as hubs

[danimesq]

trafficstars

[AnthyG]

This is actually something that I've already said that I want to do it. But I haven't yet experimented with the hub or merger feature or whatever it actually is, so this won't be until unknown times.

[danimesq]

For scalability, move all group/channel data to its hubs, when you launch this feature.

[AnthyG]

I can't move anything to anything because I have absolutely no way of knowing what messages belong to which group. Also, I think the hub-for-group/channel should rather be optional, though I will think about this more, when I've actually made this feature.

[danimesq]

You need to attribute messages to groups, or the app will be huge.

[AnthyG]

Well I can understand that for the future, but it still doesn't help me in any way, because as I said before, I do not know which messages belong to which group. That's the whole point of full encryption for the messages. Nobody is supposed to know which message belong to which group.

[danimesq]

I think you can encrypt messages but attribute it to a group. Or implement hubs now for app's size sake.

[krixano]

He's saying he wouldn't know where to move the existing messages because they are fully encrypted to ensure nobody can even see what group they are in.

[danimesq]

Yes. When entering site, there is a message about that all messages can be deleted since it is in early development stage. When in stable, chat groups/channels as hubs is a need.

[krixano]

He's already said he will do it for new messages when he implements it in the future.

[danimesq]

Sorry for the misunderstood. I forgot that the messages will be deleted for reduce app size, while hubs are not implemented.