TonyM

@pmario @Jermolene I raised a related [discussion](https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/tiddlywikidev/-aC6jWNTHdI) on hackability through patchability. That would lend itself to modifying the body actions by patch. Notwithstanding the suggested patch method, I am proposing...

Post script. In support of my argument that provisioning custom-actions where I suggest (the button body), is if you consider trying to patch the other message, and external actions that...

@Mario is that similar to my current custom button actions? I restate my dislike of forcing external actions which means the content of a button can't be in the button...

Mario, I am playing with button-hack-concept.zip it looks good. I still need to wrap my head around it fully. What standard would we impose on the core buttons to allow...

@pmario If the default set of actions were quite complex, as are some of the existing buttons, how would a user indicate to include additional actions rather than replace all...

@pmario I like the approach in your button hack macro. and I agree if we are revisiting the actions it would be nice to treat them like a new "tiddlywiki...

I applaud consideration of such debug tools, but as someone who does a lot of "reverse engineering" in tiddlywiki, I do have tools that help, and we could have an...

> So @AnthonyMuscio do you already have code or demo, any inspiration will help. My comment was intended to apply to the features discussed in this thread, not so much...

In wikitext we can use the thisTiddler variable to find where code is. ________________________________ From: lin onetwo ***@***.***> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2024 9:39:41 PM To: TiddlyWiki/TiddlyWiki5 ***@***.***> Cc: Anthony...

Did I understand correctly, Erics example, is that one drags and drops the `>` symbol? I as I wrote here https://talk.tiddlywiki.org/t/astounding-ux-enhancement-and-proposal-from-eric/10371/5?u=tw_tones I have had a solution for this in the...