Anthony Miller

Thanks for all the detailed information you've given us on your approach here. I'm going to be getting this implemented for the 2.0 version that we are currently working on....

I'm looking into making the `RequestBodyCreator` async for 2.0, but I'm feeling like this isn't really an appropriate solution to your problem. We definitely need to support the use case...

Thanks for bringing up a discussion on this. The repo is pretty old and has a long history, so it makes sense that it takes a bit of time to...

After further discussion, the team feels that there isn't really an actionable solution to this we are comfortable with. With the introduction of registry support in Swift 5.7.1, users who...

Thank you both for your feedback @TizianoCoroneo & @jimisaacs. That's really helpful. I'm going to need to do some more thinking and will update this RFC soon. @jimisaacs > I...

Due to the excellent feedback I've gotten here, we've decided to go in a different direction with the 2.0. There will still be significant changes to support `async/await`, but the...

The RFC has been updated to reflect the current state of work on 2.0. This is still subject to change and additional feedback is appreciated!

@JOyo246 I haven't added that part to the RFC yet, because I haven't gotten to working on that part of the library yet. Making these safely `Sendable` was a question...

Thanks for the input all. @swizzlr I'll think about this more before moving forward. My intention here was to ensure that cache read/writes are done serially and prevent races conditions....

Thanks for the feedback. I'm going to go back to the drawing board and make sure we get this right!