TAP implementation changes expected offset

[Anonoei]

Different implementations of TAP have different expected offsets. Examples:

TAP Name	Expected Result	Offsets observed	Travel observed	Travel-to-offset
CL CNC Tap	0.03-1mm	-0.15, -0.042	0.0740, 0.025	* 2
CL CNC 2	0.5-1.5mm	-0.83	0.047	* 17.7
TAP R6	0.5-2mm	-1.04	0.045	* 23
TAP R8	0.5-2mm	-1.260, -1.320	0.0270	* 10 + 1
Mellow Tap	0.5-2mm	-1.725
Vitalli CNC	0.5-2mm	-0.865, -1.070	0.500

Thanks to the people below for providing these numbers

• RedWish, Migo, Sanaa, EightFinger, Morfesto, cplmayo

---

Observed results

v2 Stock RC8 Results (Redwish), expected ~1.260

Samples: 5, Total Steps: 27
Probe Mean: 0.0038 / Min: 0.0013 / Max: 0.0050
Measure Mean: 0.0308 / Min: 0.0308 / Max: 0.0308
Travel Mean: 0.0270 / Min: 0.0250 / Max: 0.0300

v1 Vitalli MetalTap (EightFinger), expected ~0.865

Samples: 10, total Steps: 100
Probe Mean: -0.0235 / Min: -0.0356 / Max: -0.0069
Measure Mean: 0.0265 / Min: 0.0265 / Max: 0.0265
Travel Mean: 0.0500 / Min: 0.0500 / Max: 0.0500
Calculated STA Z-Offset: 0.052

CL CNC v2 (cplmayo), expected -0.830

Samples: 5, Total Steps: 47
Probe Mean: -0.0002 / Min: -0.0012 / Max: 0.0013
Measure Mean: 0.0468 / Min: 0.0468 / Max: 0.0468
Travel Mean: 0.0470 / Min: 0.0450 / Max: 0.0500
Calculated z-offset: 0.094