Andrew S. Rosen
Andrew S. Rosen
Would we need to close the forum since it's specifically labeled as being for fireworks?
@utf. Thanks for expanding on my initial idea to transform this into a great discussion about the API as a whole. I think these are all fantastic. In particular >...
FWIW: Going to try to tackle more of @utf's ideas next week!
@utf: Alright, we are getting there! First, a summary and then a question for you. ## Summary I have now added a `__getattr__` method, in addition to `__getitem__`, that allows...
@utf: Thank you! That fixes it and makes a lot of sense. @janosh: It seems this change caused some of your magic method tests to fail with a recursion error,...
@janosh: Thanks! For your example though, we don't know if `name` is in the output until the `OutputReference` is resolved at runtime, right? That seems like that would cause a...
In full disclosure, I am going to need to put this PR on hold. Anyone willing to can feel free to expand on it with a follow-up PR if they...
Thank you for kicking this off (again), @davidwaroquiers! As you already know, I'm a huge proponent of this idea in general. I'll let @utf take the lead on any logistical...
@davidwaroquiers: is there anything here that you would like me to prototype or add onto to help keep the ball rolling on this? I can't make any guarantees of course...
Note to self: Ignoring the changes to `__getitem__` here, which are for a separate discussion, the changes implemented by @davidwaroquiers "work" for the simple case of one `@flow` in a...