Andrew S. Rosen
Andrew S. Rosen
Thanks. That's my conclusion as well. Only thing I'm uncertain about is the --tblite flag with --opt in xTB. Will try to do a test.
Yup. I just thought it could be potentially confusing to the user.
This is consistent with my testing as well. When I ran aspects of my suite "manually" without using coverage reports or even pytest, the speed seemed okay.
> @Andrew-S-Rosen I've created https://github.com/cclib/cclib/releases/tag/v1.8.1rc1. Would be able and willing to try it? It all [checks out for me](https://github.com/Quantum-Accelerators/quacc/actions/runs/8132103147)! 🚀
@berquist: [Looks good to me!](https://github.com/Quantum-Accelerators/quacc/pull/1896)
Also looks good! :)
@berquist: Very exciting to hear about the forthcoming cclib paper! I think that will be wonderful, and I would be honored to be involved. > your preferred name Andrew S....
@RedStar-Iron: Apologies, but I unfortunately don't have time to look at this PR. @chiang-yuan and/or @janosh might be interested, however.
Any ideas off-hand why the Sm is an issue here? Is it a symmetry issue? Nothing jumps out at me.
What is the expected behavior here? The Sm, Pr, and Pb all have fractional occupancies. ASE does not support fractional occupancies to the best of my knowledge. And VESTA seems...