AndreasPK

Turned out to be not so near but I updated the hash and rebased. Let's see what CI says.

This seems like an CI issue but I'm not entirely sure. Not sure if I have rights to restart CI jobs. Here is the key error: ``` Project settings changed,...

@Mikolaj Any insight?

@Mikolaj Seems CI passes now. Let me know if I need to do anything else.

> @AndreasPK: it would be cool to fit this into cabal 3.10. The windows is closing, though... I will try to take a look tomorrow.

Please take another look.

The test currently only checks if the profiling detail setting is accepted. Not which effect it has. Ideally we would check for the annotation mode by grepping for the corresponding...

> You are right profiling is woefully undertested. All the more reason to add a bit more fleshed out test. How about something like > > https://github.com/haskell/cabal/blob/master/cabal-testsuite/PackageTests/ReplCSources/cabal.test.hs > > Would...

> newtype Set a = Set (Map a ()) This would increase the size of the `Set` constructor by an additional pointer. Which is probably not worthwhile when the Set...

> Looks like GHC doesn't inline small/trivial functions when profiling is enabled unless they are marked with INLINE pragmas. As for why this happens, it would be best to ask...