andy Augustin
andy Augustin
> Hi @Robert95Sch , what exactly do you mean by deploy now instance? Also not sure if I understand completly your approach. Would be nice if you could explain the...
> Hi @frunika , thanks a lot for your feature request! :) We have not yet figured out a way to upgrade workflows with 100% certainty that no customizations on...
Hi @JakobHavtorn , I understand your idea and the use case. Most likely will help. Maybe as a first step an option to sync the tags makes sense. Currently (due...
@all-contributors please add @JakobHavtorn for idea
@JakobHavtorn sorry for delay. At least I have a PR available to sync the tags (first step). #561 Actually the code is already there since a while, did not have...
Hi @egulatee and thanks for the feature request. There is actually the feature of ignoring changes with a `.templatesyncignore` file. This is working like a `.gitignore` file. Is this a...
Hmm 🤔 possibly a change for the git remote pull params is a possible way to go? I can imaging using `-X yours` instead of using the default could work...
The issue I see here are how to handle merge conflicts within the automation. Imagine a conflict. How to solve it and commit and keep the conflict marker and show...
Hi @egulatee just wanted to let you know that I did not have time yet too look deeper into the issue.
Hi @JakobHavtorn and thanks for the issue. Does the token have access to the remote repository? The token has also a setting related to *repository access*. 