Anderson Torres
Anderson Torres
> I don't see really enough benefit in step 2, it just creates more work for us. Removing packages should not be more work than adding packages. It does not...
I am merely saying that this is mostly independent from underlying source code control. Any package can be (re)inserted at any time, given the current contributing guidelines. And this is...
> (which is implemented but not merged yet, FWIW) Anything blocking the merge?
> We already have a precedent for it in the language, `inherit (from)` and I really dislike it as well. Off-topic: I think we lost a great chance for suggesting...
I am inclined to shepherd this for the sake of advancing the RFC, however I am not so sure if I can deal with three RFCs at the same time.
OK then, I recruit myself as shepherd.
How can it be? From a "less fragile link" we are now at "drop it entirely"! Since removing things makes Nixpkgs smaller and arguably no functionality is lost, I am...
> I do wish we got full diff links too, though… However this is too dependent on the "forge". E. G. live555 upstream provides only a tarball, and only for...
In order to keep the conversation more discoverable, please refer to the lines of the file itself (the first one in case of general remarks).
Given that the original developer of Home Manager agrees with assimilating HM, I want to reformulate a truckload of things. Further I am cleaning up too much things on Nixpkgs...