Biguri

Thanks @tsadakane for testing! I suspect this may have to do with a missing memset, due to its erratic behaviour. Its likely that here a cudamemset is missing and that...

Hi @yliu88au, I think this is supposed to be doing the the same thing (that is what I intended to code anyway!) , but I haven't been able to test...

@yliu88au on top of the conversion to flat, I am also going to try to add data loaders for the machine that outputs it. If your lab based system has...

@yliu88au absolutely no problem :)

This is on hold until I can get data to test it.

@vincentme Your understanding is correct, if you are using the python version. This is mostly because the python version is not fully finished. We need to change the way computation...

@KrisThielemans Sure. Want to add some sort of check for decay correction? I don't remember well, but isn't one of the input parameters if the data is decay corrected?

@KrisThielemans if I add to `DynamicDiscretisedDensity` `decay_corrected()`, this doesn't really solve much of a problem right? because we don't fill this nor use it anywhere. So I propose we just...

@KrisThielemans when the input is in "activity", is it decay corrected too? My gut says that it would make sense for it to be called activity only if its decay...

> * [ ] `SinglesRatesFromGEHDF5` > > * expose `GEHDF5Wrapper.get_exam_info_sptr()` You mean creating `SinglesRatesFromGEHDF5::get_exam_info_sptr()`? `GEHDF5Wrapper.get_exam_info_sptr()` is exposed and read in that class. > * [ ] in `ProjDataGEHDF5` avoid reading...