Louis Gesbert

Thanks for sharing an interesting use-case. I don't know if you had a more generic way of doing this in mind, but maybe it would be possible to have the...

> I guess that would work yes. Would that allow to do this: have the tests in core depends on core_extended and core_extended depend on core? it's the point, `core+tests`...

I still don't have a good story on this, but there might be a way using the new `{post}` dependencies, which are designed to avoid cyclic dependencies. So having `bin_prot`...

Related to #1520 I'm actually on something that may help with this.

Good idea, but note that you can already shorten this to ``` opam switch export - --switch FROM | opam switch import - --yes ``` that won't work if you...

Grmbl I think I found yet another issue : if the package is already pinned, but to a different target, and running with `--deps-only`, it seems the correct opam file...

Just update this: - now based on #5295 → should be rebased once (if) merged - re-added the changelog patch - the norepo test is great! @rjbou I :heavy_check_mark: and...

Note: https://github.com/ocaml/opam/pull/5236#issuecomment-1214361502 is still valid & we shouldn't forget to open a separate issue if still present once this is merged.

haha our cycle detection function didn't detect cycles that small it seems ^^

Huh, I am sorry if I skipped that part of a discussion... but I don't see a link between the explicit package revisions discussed in #4566 and the general version-comparison...