Alonski
What to call Supporters and Supportees
Creators and Supporters? Or do we want to not have the connotation that Creators must "create" something?
I don't think Creators is the best term because we want to be broader than that. Everyone can be both users essentially. I can have my own profile and you can subscribe to me. I can also subscribe to Tim if I want to later on.
everyone is a coinpanion, the sender is a coinpanion, the reciever is a coinpanion, sometimes the reciever will become a sender and yet, still, he will be a coinpanion. Everyone is a coinpanion :+1: "coinpanion billion age" ; coinpanion 2018, coinpanion 2020. We're all coinpanions on the chain. at least in the front end it should be mentioned everywhere until the coinpanions see the coinpanion logo when the close their eyes.
It could make sense that everyone has the same name: CoinPanion. I am concerned that people will get confused when there isn't a clear cut between: Supporters and Supportees
Maybe we should just for the sake of simpleness call everyone Users and thats it?
Along with what I said about Coined by user x and You coined user y
I think this will be fine.
Thoughts?
I much prefer coinpanions (and to use it like "smurfs" in English or "stroumpf" in French) but simplicity is more important than this... I do like your idea re : "coined user y" :-) all is clear and fine. I don't think this will be a very important success factor here. On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 at 07:59, Alon Bukai [email protected] wrote:
Maybe we should just for the sake of simpleness call everyone Users and thats it? Along with what I said about Coined by user x and You coined user y I think this will be fine. Thoughts?
— You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Alonski/CoinPanion/issues/6#issuecomment-306109883, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARXoQAw0yc3DK_q83OOdaOPrY0ghTj5dks5sA5lDgaJpZM4Nr_iw .
Yes I agree with both points. Let's go with the "coined x.." "coined by x..." terminology for now. I think this issue can be closed.