Cache status after getFingerprint
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
#16444
@kuszz Thanks for this performance improvement, please fix the style issue.
@kuszz Please care about the failed tests, I help to copy one failed test callstack, it seems broke by this PR.
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: path name does not match ufs status name /tmp/junit4471494242978627946/junit7460544120945017143
at alluxio.underfs.UfsStatusCache.addStatus(UfsStatusCache.java:100)
at alluxio.master.file.InodeSyncStream.syncExistingInodeMetadata(InodeSyncStream.java:820)
at alluxio.master.file.InodeSyncStream.syncInodeMetadata(InodeSyncStream.java:730)
at alluxio.master.file.InodeSyncStream.syncInternal(InodeSyncStream.java:474)
at alluxio.master.file.InodeSyncStream.sync(InodeSyncStream.java:404)
at alluxio.master.file.FileSystemMasterSyncMetadataFlushJournalTest.run(FileSystemMasterSyncMetadataFlushJournalTest.java:139)
at alluxio.master.file.FileSystemMasterSyncMetadataFlushJournalTest.flatDirectory(FileSystemMasterSyncMetadataFlushJournalTest.java:71)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethod.invoke(TestMethod.java:68)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:326)
at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie$2.run(MethodRoadie.java:89)
at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(MethodRoadie.java:97)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:310)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.executeTestInSuper(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:131)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.access$100(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:59)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner$TestExecutorStatement.evaluate(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:147)
at org.junit.rules.ExternalResource$1.evaluate(ExternalResource.java:54)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.evaluateStatement(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:107)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:82)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:298)
at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTest(MethodRoadie.java:87)
at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.run(MethodRoadie.java:50)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.invokeTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:218)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.runMethods(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:160)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$1.run(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:134)
at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runUnprotected(ClassRoadie.java:34)
at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runProtected(ClassRoadie.java:44)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.run(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:136)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.run(JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.java:117)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.run(AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.java:57)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner.run(PowerMockRunner.java:59)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:364)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:272)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:237)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:158)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:428)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:162)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:562)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:548)
@kuszz Please care about the failed tests, I help to copy one failed test callstack, it seems broke by this PR.
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: path name does not match ufs status name /tmp/junit4471494242978627946/junit7460544120945017143 at alluxio.underfs.UfsStatusCache.addStatus(UfsStatusCache.java:100) at alluxio.master.file.InodeSyncStream.syncExistingInodeMetadata(InodeSyncStream.java:820) at alluxio.master.file.InodeSyncStream.syncInodeMetadata(InodeSyncStream.java:730) at alluxio.master.file.InodeSyncStream.syncInternal(InodeSyncStream.java:474) at alluxio.master.file.InodeSyncStream.sync(InodeSyncStream.java:404) at alluxio.master.file.FileSystemMasterSyncMetadataFlushJournalTest.run(FileSystemMasterSyncMetadataFlushJournalTest.java:139) at alluxio.master.file.FileSystemMasterSyncMetadataFlushJournalTest.flatDirectory(FileSystemMasterSyncMetadataFlushJournalTest.java:71) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethod.invoke(TestMethod.java:68) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:326) at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie$2.run(MethodRoadie.java:89) at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(MethodRoadie.java:97) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:310) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.executeTestInSuper(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:131) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.access$100(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:59) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner$TestExecutorStatement.evaluate(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:147) at org.junit.rules.ExternalResource$1.evaluate(ExternalResource.java:54) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.evaluateStatement(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:107) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:82) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:298) at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTest(MethodRoadie.java:87) at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.run(MethodRoadie.java:50) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.invokeTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:218) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.runMethods(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:160) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$1.run(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:134) at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runUnprotected(ClassRoadie.java:34) at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runProtected(ClassRoadie.java:44) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.run(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:136) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.run(JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.java:117) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.run(AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.java:57) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner.run(PowerMockRunner.java:59) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:364) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:272) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:237) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:158) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:428) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:162) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:562) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:548)
@maobaolong Thanks, I have modified the code.
@kuszz Left a minor comment.
Otherwise, would you please give more codes or information to prove why and when this can reduce call to ufs.
InodeSyncStream.syncInodeMetadata(line 730) -> syncExistingInodeMetadata(InodeSyncStream line 818, getParsedFingerprint -> BaseUnderFileSystem.getFingerprint -> getStatus) -> mStatusCache.prefetchChildren(InodeSyncStream line 916)
@kuszz Is there any update?
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in two weeks if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in two weeks if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.