Mart Frauenlob
Mart Frauenlob
> dpkg -i openzfs-zfs-dkms_2.2.0-0_all.deb > dpkg: regarding openzfs-zfs-dkms_2.2.0-0_all.deb containing openzfs-zfs-dkms: > openzfs-zfs-dkms conflicts with zfs-dkms It just looked like you still have zfs-dkms installed.
@blind-oracle I don't think that's true. Provides does not mean the package must be virtual. It can also be a real package name. searching for all virtual packages and grepping...
@blind-oracle I was just trying to say, that it's not a virtual package. But I think I just misunderstood, what you were saying with "virtual thing". I didn't know, that...
> @rincebrain maybe the old way works (thru alien), I haven't yet tried. But I wanted to have the native ones if they were announced... And then you could easily...
Hm, are you saying apt does not recognize version 2.2 is higher than 2.1? And even then, isn't that just postponing the same thing just with different names?
@behlendorf Unless the tarball for 2.2.0 has been fixed the issue remains. That's why I linked the issue comment in my PR.
@tonyhutter Could you take a look? Why are the 2.2.x release tarballs broken? Is it something that is automated by github, or???
@gcoretech https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/16746 https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/16781
You'll may need to do a bit of reading on `pipx` and how to manage its virtual environments (`venv`).