Alexandre
Alexandre
That's much better indeed, thanks for the suggestion!
Thanks for the in-depth report, as well as the unit tests! I'll check that one out as soon as possible.
Indeed, I did not unpin #543 since 1) it was a long awaited feature request, and 2) it changes quite a bit the philosophy of AutoNumeric where the value was...
Hey @Norcoen , which version of AutoNumeric do you use? Could you please create a reproducible example? Thanks!
Well, the problem is that AutoNumeric needs to know when the browser(s) update the input in order to update the `rawValue` and so on. We need to check which event...
You're welcome to send a [pull request](https://github.com/autoNumeric/autoNumeric/compare) anytime, as stated by this issues' tags :kissing_smiling_eyes: Or, you can lobby the browser makers to respect a standard there too, that would...
Well, with Firefox `v65.0b6`, I cannot reproduce the bug at all. I first tried the [workaround](https://codepen.io/AnotherLinuxUser/pen/VqExzv?editors=1010), then the [vanilla version](https://codepen.io/AnotherLinuxUser/pen/oJadpX?editors=1010), and using the autocomplete combobox to select the value, then...
@eureka2 I´ll consider it
Hi @zangloo > i think the change event should not fired on step 5 What makes you think that? When reading the [*change* page](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Events/change) on MDN, I can read: >...
@zangloo Your English is pretty good :) @BobKnothe what's your take on this `change` event matter?