EDM: 250/256 steps

[Felix-Petersen]

Hi,

thanks for the great paper and code. I found a potential typo and confusion on a result for EDM with 250/256 samples.

My confusion comes from 250 vs. 256 samples: In C.3 and 5.2, you state 250 samples. But then in C.4 and Table C.1, you say it's 256 samples. Also, the EDM source only provides guidance on 256 samples. Probably a typo and you meant actually always write 256 samples?

Also, rather than including 250/256 samples for EDM, you make a new table in the appendix. Why not include it in the actual paper? I mean the result is quite strong.

Thanks and best regards,

Felix