Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev

@rba maybe you can already start hosting [it](https://github.com/CIAvash/raku-website) on let's say https://new.raku.org ? This way more people will be able to look (and take it more seriously) :)

@FCO sorry your comment came in a bit mangled. I tried to fix it but probably made it a little bit worse. I think email replies don't come properly through...

I think @FCO mean this color issue:  And this wasted empty space on the left side: 

Any updates? Or any thoughts on how this can go forward? Generally, it looks pretty nice, but the layout is sloppy and there are some bugs. I don't think we...

> I guess design would be a priority. I think the order for domains that need to be brought back up is right currently (most important on top).

I've said it before and I'll say it again: the way we do versioning right now totally made sense when the language was called Perl 6. But with the proper...

> if `e` is higher than `6`, I'd prefer version `e` We can prefer it in our bubble but everyone else is still confused about the letter. We didn't release...

No, we're not going to change the version backwards. If there are any changes to versioning, 7.0 is the only way it can realistically happen. It's a good thing, we...

> the only way it can realistically happen > Raku 20 OK, I stand corrected, that is also an option. I'm not sure if it's better to do it that...

Sounds great! But shouldn't it be part of http://docs.perl6.org/ and not the main site?