Alad Wenter
Alad Wenter
>... I don't see the point to make empty rants on issue trackers of other projects how one is more "mature" than the other (for whatever definition of that term)....
`-Ud` is the same hack pacaur used. I would hardly call overriding dependency information a good idea (even when both official Arch and AUR packages mostly lack said information). Essentially...
It's not. Trizen still lacks a proper mechanism to deal with split packages.
Related discussion: https://github.com/actionless/pikaur/issues/53
You can avoid most package conflicts by using a local repository. See #34. Otherwise this ticket is a duplicate of #42.
Note that `message.sh` lacks PURPLE (`\e[1;35`) and CYAN (`\e[1;35`). `source.sh` may also be useful, e.g for `get_protocol`.
Such a package is impossible for AUR helpers using the AUR RPC to handle, because latter does not expose `provides`.
Once you've reached the stage of being "popular", keeping a healthy community becomes IMO a very complex problem. In Arch, we have the benefit of a comparatively involved installation process...
You need to install packages anyway to build packages (`depends`, `makedepends`). This looks like more of a failing in those pacman hooks.
OpenBSD probably has the best `tsort` implementation on this regard: http://man.openbsd.org/tsort That said, I'd agree to have auracle do the heavy lifting. Perhaps open a new issue to expand on...