Akihiro Suda

Could you explain the purpose of this?

Are we fine to accept this with (3A)? cc @kolyshkin

#1040 should be probably v1.0.4 or later

The v1-to-v2 conversion convention can be cherry picked to v1.0.3?

> Do runc and crun already implement the semantics described (I haven't been following all of the cgroupv2 work in both projects)? The v1-to-v2 conversion is already implemented, but the...

Let's release v1.0.3 as-is and handle the cgroup v2 stuff separately

How can we move this forward? @opencontainers/runtime-spec-maintainers

#1040 might be still controversial to rush in v1.0.3. Can it be v1.0.4? btw https://github.com/opencontainers/runtime-spec/pull/1060 seems to need prioritization for v1.0.3

https://github.com/opencontainers/runtime-spec/pull/1059 seems also harmless for v1.0.3 and easy to review

Can we have integration tests?