Ingo Bürk

> What do we need to make this happen? Reading and understanding [the specification](https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/StatusNotifierItem/) would be a good start to get a feeling.

On a side note, I've created a package for Archlinux / Manjaro in the AUR (in case you want to collect this information in the README or something): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/huestacean-git/

Thanks for the reply. I didn't know xcb_grab_server and don't seem to be able to find (meaningful) documentation on what exactly it does? _Edit:_ Does node-x11 implement `xcb_request_check`? It doesn't...

Ah, thanks for that. I was only looking for XCB and didn't find anything. Regarding the last part, I realized that after (sorry, my mistake). It makes sense that there...

> I think the cookie is a xcb artifact, not something defined in the protocol. Mh, I think so, too. The X protocol doesn't seem to know "RequestCheck" either for...

I think there's no benefit in calling `callback(null)` since I still need to make the extra request to trigger this. It only allows separating the reaction to it better. But...

@jasdel Thanks for the update! In our case, we have an API that allows users to essentially upload to S3, and we'd like to allow them to specify a checksum...

Thank you for the confirmation, @jasdel. What about this? > Is there any way to get a normal checksum of the entire object after the upload rather than the "checksum...

> I don't think this solves the use case Yes, I feel the same way. We essentially still have no way to enforce data consistency without having to expose configuration...

@nording Do you intend to do this update? As it stands, it seems this library is unusable for any supported Angular version since ViewEngine is deprecated and disabling AoT can...