Age Manning
Age Manning
Yep. I added this field in lighthouse. It was originally a test amongst all Lighthouse peers because other clients didn't support quic. We wanted to test to see how well...
Sure. I'm happy to switch to the `quic-v1` ENR field. Logic seems reasonable to me. I guess up until the next hard fork we will also support the `quic` field...
For reference @jxs linked me some research done last year into the different implementations and ultimately why we went with Quinn. Might be useful for others: https://github.com/libp2p/rust-libp2p/issues/2883#issuecomment-1547189526
Awesome. Thanks @ackintosh :pray:
@ackintosh Awesome!! Thanks for catching this! I was thinking in the transition its probably best to simply remove the transitioning peer from the local routing table. There is likely some...
Hey @ackintosh Nice. Yeah, I'm trying to think of any better way to improve on this behaviour. There's a number of things we want and facts we have to deal...
Hey @SkandaBhat - Sorry we have been away at a conference. @hopinheimer are you still looking into this? Or should @SkandaBhat have a crack?
Hey @PoulavBhowmick03 - Sorry I've been away for the last 2 weeks. I think @dknopik might be able to chime in on where we are at with this, as I...
cc @pawanjay176
I recall we did run into this problem and we made some work around, but I have now since forgotten the problem. Lets say we do implement an NotifyHandlerError event....