License review

[ashryanbeats]

Submit an issue

Topic

This is an issue regarding:

• [x] The guides contained within this repo.
• [x] The samples contained within this repo.

Versions

• [x] CEP version(s) used [must be 8.x+ for this repo]:
• [x] Supported CC app(s) and version(s): any

Description of the issue

@stevengill in light of the discussion on this pull request for the Samples repo, should we look at updating the license on this one as well?

[stevengill]

MIT is better suited for sample code than Apache v2. Apache would still be fine for sample code too, but MIT is better.

For docs, it matters even less as it isn't going to get cloned, modified and consumed like sample code would.

I'd say don't bother changing it at this stage.

[ashryanbeats]

Cool. To make sure we're all aware, this repo contains sample code that accompanies the guides.

If that changes the outcome here, let me know. We're happy to go with what the OS office suggests for this. Otherwise I'll close the issue.

[Jolg42]

I guess MIT would be better for the code (and the whole repository then 😀) and also future-proof as more code will be added in the future.