Aditya

Hi, perhaps it is clearer to express these properties the following way: > Preservation of total supply (constant or inflationary on a single source chain & module) contingent on honest...

Hello, yes we should clarify this to explicity check for an acknowledgement error rather than it not being a specific successful acknowledgement. Thank you!

@michaelfig yes. We are trying to improve the interface for middleware to avoid the complicated wiring as it exists. I think this will be much cleaner in future designs, and...

> Shouldn't we add it to ICS26 directly? Yes but add it in a separate document since not all modules will have to implement this interface > I could do...

> Another question: will it be possible to have incentivized broadcast channels? If so, how will that work? Yes, this would be done on the subscriber side. This is out...

Hi could you give this a review @seunlanlege?

Thanks @ValarDragon for the detailed issue writeup! I want to first double check my understanding of your proposals and then I have some questions on the basis of my understanding....

This implies that intra-sequence order is not respected on the receiving end? Is that correct?

Additionally, we'd like to be able to define a gas limit per message so that a message in the front of the queue does not consume all the gas in...

Thank you everyone for the feedback so far. We are committed to going in this direction with the IBC protocol. Given the scope of this change, it doesn't make sense...