www.sankei.com
Sorry. The website is infected by AdShield, Inc.
Unfortunately, It is complicated to resolve with a regular adblock rule because the website is being protected by service of Ad-Shield that is an anti-adblock company.
Userscript Installation
Please block Ad-Shield advertisement by installing tinyShield userscript. Please check its installation guideline written in English by visiting this URL.
If you can understand Korean language, please refer https://github.com/List-KR/tinyShield/blob/main/README.ko.md.
Detailed description for iOS users
- Install Usercripts app
- Enable Usercripts extension in Safari settings
- iOS 18+:
System settings=>Apps=>Safari=>Extensions - iOS 17 and older:
System settings=>Safari=>ExtensionsFind Usercripts, enable it and allowOn other sitespermission
- iOS 18+:
- Open the tinyShield userscript URL in browser
- Press the extensions icon in the address bar of Safari and select Userscripts
- Tap to install
- In opened popup, scroll down and press Install button
- Done.
Still Have a Problem?
An issue is occurred when the userscript is applied, please report to this issue tracker.
@piquark6046
added
Issue URL (Incorrect Blocking)
https://www.sankei.com/article/20250409-XRF7VEB2ZBD4POJJPUGFG7K3TY/
Screenshots
Screenshot 1

Screenshot 1 with AdGuard disabled

System configuration
| Information | Value |
|---|---|
| AdGuard product: | AdGuard Browser Extension v4.4.49 |
| System version: | macOS 15.3 |
| Browser: | Firefox |
| Tracking protection: | disabled |
| Filters: | Ad blocking: AdGuard Base |
| Browsing Security: | disabled |
| Browsing Security statistics: | disabled |
Maybe @@||html-load.com/loader.min.js$domain=sankei.com is required for FF? TinyShield also works only this script is unblocked.
In Chrome all good.
@piquark6046 @Yuki2718
Just a matter of changing $$script:contains(html-load.com) to $$script[tag-content="html-load.com"]. It should be done to all $$script:contains() till https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardBrowserExtension/issues/3150 gets fixed
Changed for AS, but there are still many. Also please check the new filters are properly distributed to Firefox, as it looks $$script:contains() is not distributed.
As I recall, $$ rules are disabled (in filters compiler/registry) for filter lists for Firefox extension, so if I'm not wrong, it will be not available in Base filter for Firefox.
https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardFilters/issues/201149#issuecomment-2782308933
IMO that should be changed now after converting all the $$script:contains() (as it makes the page never to load). The only safe way to fix this issue will be $$script[tag-content="html-load.com"]. $csp works too but it's risky and can't be used for all sites. Or possibly rewrite with $replace?
if I'm not wrong, it has been disabled few years ago
What was the issue? can't find by searching Issues.
Or possibly rewrite with
$replace?
||sankei.com^$replace=/<script>\(function\(\)\{function[\s\S]*?report\.error-report\.com\/modal[\s\S]*\(\);<\/script>//,document somehow makes the page blank too.
This rule:
||sankei.com^$replace=/<script>\(function\(\)\{function[\s\S]*?report\.error-report\.com\/modal[\s\S]*?\(\);<\/script>//,document
should works correctly.
What was the issue? can't find by searching Issues.
Probably these two: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardBrowserExtension/issues/2017 https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardBrowserExtension/issues/2249
Hmm, on my end the match is the same, but sure it works and *? will generally be safer. Probably we should generalize as
$document,replace=/<script>\(function\(\)\{function[\s\S]*?report\.error-report\.com\/modal[\s\S]*?\(\);<\/script>//,domain=sankei.com
and copy the all domains in the html filter? There may be sites with different script, but they can be adjusted later if we get complaints.
Probably these two: AdguardTeam/AdguardBrowserExtension#2017 AdguardTeam/AdguardBrowserExtension#2249
I can't reproduce any more, can you?
Hmm, on my end the match is the same, but sure it works and
*?will generally be safer. Probably we should generalize as$document,replace=/<script>\(function\(\)\{function[\s\S]*?report\.error-report\.com\/modal[\s\S]*?\(\);<\/script>//,domain=sankei.comand copy the all domains in the html filter? There may be sites with different script, but they can be adjusted later if we get complaints.
Looks good to me.
Probably these two: AdguardTeam/AdguardBrowserExtension#2017 AdguardTeam/AdguardBrowserExtension#2249
I can't reproduce any more, can you?
No, I cannot. But these two: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardBrowserExtension/issues/2646 https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardBrowserExtension/issues/2826 seems to be still problematic (especially the first one).
(especially the first one).
All right, but looks it's only if
Attribute selector with an operator that is not a simple equality
So I guess only [a*="b"] kinds should be disabled. Disabling whole html filtes is a big loss. Regarding :contains() we can temporally change on fiter side.
Considering the fact that it has been disabled few years ago and as far as I understand, it should be fixed in v5.2, then I think that it would be better to wait for extension update and then enable $$ rules for Firefox.
@Alex-302?
@AdamWr Yes. Because :contains() will be in 5.3
Issue URL (Ads)
Comment
ここ数日(問題を認識したのは5/12)特定のサイトで広告が消えなくなった。『手動で要素をブロック』を行ったが再び表示される。問題の切り分けのため、手動で設定したユーザールールは現在全て削除した。 SNS上で正体不明の人物(フィルターメンテナーを自称)から『一度すべてのコンテンツブロッカーを無効にし、再度有効にしてSafariを再起動』との指摘があったが正体不明なため保留している。 Username:
@siidekei
Screenshots
Screenshot 1

System configuration
| Information | Value |
|---|---|
| AdGuard product: | AdGuard for Safari v1.11.22 |
| System version: | MacOS Sequoia バージョン15.5(24F74) |
| Filters: | Ad blocking: AdGuard Base Privacy: AdGuard Tracking Protection Other: Filter unblocking search ads and self-promotion Language-specific: AdGuard Japanese |
| Other extensions used: | Microsoft Defender |
ここ数日(問題を認識したのは5/12)特定のサイトで広告が消えなくなった。『手動で要素をブロック』を行ったが再び表示される。問題の切り分けのため、手動で設定したユーザールールは現在全て削除した。 SNS上で正体不明の人物(フィルターメンテナーを自称)から『一度すべてのコンテンツブロッカーを無効にし、再度有効にしてSafariを再起動』との指摘があったが正体不明なため保留している。
はい、その正体不明の人物が私ですがひとまずそれを実行してください。私のコメントに"Collaborator"の表記があり、https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardFilters/commit/f3b8c8f7b57bcca2249f62a73e44801345b0de4e のように実際にフィルターを編集しているのが証拠です。
@Alex-302 ~~@jellizaveta~~ Can you check the state of AS with AdGuard for Safari? The current generic cosmetic filters are only for iOS and Android CB, but IDK if the advanced rules work fine on AdGuard for Safari.
@Yuki2718 I see ads, but tinyShield blocks it succesfully using https://apps.apple.com/ua/app/userscripts/id1463298887
@Alex-302 Then I will cover adguard_ext_safari too in the generic rules. ~~Pity it hasn't been reported until now.~~ The slips were reported but nobody noticed... https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardFilters/issues?q=state%3Aopen%20label%3A%22N%3A%20AdGuard%20for%20Safari%22%20label%3AAd-Shield