AdGuardDNS icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
AdGuardDNS copied to clipboard

Request new server location: Hong Kong

Open SukkaW opened this issue 10 months ago • 7 comments

Issue Details

$ mtr 94.140.14.49

                                                                      Packets                                                                     Packets               Pings
 Host                                               Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
 1. [redacted]                                       9.3%    54  725.5 568.3   0.3 794.0 249.4
 2. [redacted]                                       0.0%    54    1.3   1.8   1.0  28.6   3.8
 3. te0-4-0-4-8.202.ccr21.hkg02.atlas.cogentco.com   0.0%    54    2.1   3.3   2.1  24.1   4.7
 4. be2923.ccr31.sin01.atlas.cogentco.com            0.0%    54   33.1  33.1  32.9  34.1   0.2
 5. datacamp.demarc.cogentco.com                     1.9%    54   34.1  34.1  34.0  34.2   0.1
 6. vl223.sgp-eq3-dist-2.cdn77.com                   0.0%    54   35.6  35.7  35.6  35.8   0.1
 7. 94-140-14-49.adguard.com                         0.0%    54   36.1  36.1  36.0  36.2   0.0

Proposed solution

Adding a new server location in Hong Kong.

Alternative solution

No response

SukkaW avatar Aug 11 '23 08:08 SukkaW

can you make a normal traceroute including the latency?

ghost avatar Aug 11 '23 13:08 ghost

can you make a normal traceroute including the latency?

traceroute to 94.140.14.49 (94.140.14.49), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  * * *
 2  10.60.0.1 (10.60.0.1)  1.360 ms  1.352 ms  1.325 ms
 3  te0-4-0-4-8.202.ccr21.hkg02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.18.8.37)  2.140 ms  2.309 ms  2.289 ms
 4  be2923.ccr31.sin01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.87.225)  32.960 ms  37.780 ms  32.654 ms
 5  datacamp.demarc.cogentco.com (154.18.17.2)  33.714 ms  33.710 ms 154.18.33.74 (154.18.33.74)  32.261 ms
 6  vl223.sgp-eq3-dist-2.cdn77.com (185.156.45.99)  40.475 ms vl221.sgp-eq3-dist-1.cdn77.com (185.156.45.95)  35.451 ms  40.290 ms
 7  * * *
 8  * * *
 9  * * *
10  * * *
11  * * *
12  * * *
13  * * *
14  * * *
15  * * *
16  * * *
17  * * *
18  * * *
19  * * *
20  * * *
21  * * *
22  * * *
23  * * *
24  * * *
25  * * *
26  * * *
27  * * *
28  * * *
29  * * *
30  * * *

@ijuliank

SukkaW avatar Aug 13 '23 14:08 SukkaW

can you make a normal traceroute including the latency?

traceroute to 94.140.14.49 (94.140.14.49), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  * * *
 2  10.60.0.1 (10.60.0.1)  1.360 ms  1.352 ms  1.325 ms
 3  te0-4-0-4-8.202.ccr21.hkg02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.18.8.37)  2.140 ms  2.309 ms  2.289 ms
 4  be2923.ccr31.sin01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.87.225)  32.960 ms  37.780 ms  32.654 ms
 5  datacamp.demarc.cogentco.com (154.18.17.2)  33.714 ms  33.710 ms 154.18.33.74 (154.18.33.74)  32.261 ms
 6  vl223.sgp-eq3-dist-2.cdn77.com (185.156.45.99)  40.475 ms vl221.sgp-eq3-dist-1.cdn77.com (185.156.45.95)  35.451 ms  40.290 ms
 7  * * *
 8  * * *
 9  * * *
10  * * *
11  * * *
12  * * *
13  * * *
14  * * *
15  * * *
16  * * *
17  * * *
18  * * *
19  * * *
20  * * *
21  * * *
22  * * *
23  * * *
24  * * *
25  * * *
26  * * *
27  * * *
28  * * *
29  * * *
30  * * *

@ijuliank

i dont see why this is needed, its around 40/50ms?

ghost avatar Aug 16 '23 15:08 ghost

can you make a normal traceroute including the latency?

traceroute to 94.140.14.49 (94.140.14.49), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  * * *
 2  10.60.0.1 (10.60.0.1)  1.360 ms  1.352 ms  1.325 ms
 3  te0-4-0-4-8.202.ccr21.hkg02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.18.8.37)  2.140 ms  2.309 ms  2.289 ms
 4  be2923.ccr31.sin01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.87.225)  32.960 ms  37.780 ms  32.654 ms
 5  datacamp.demarc.cogentco.com (154.18.17.2)  33.714 ms  33.710 ms 154.18.33.74 (154.18.33.74)  32.261 ms
 6  vl223.sgp-eq3-dist-2.cdn77.com (185.156.45.99)  40.475 ms vl221.sgp-eq3-dist-1.cdn77.com (185.156.45.95)  35.451 ms  40.290 ms
 7  * * *
 8  * * *
 9  * * *
10  * * *
11  * * *
12  * * *
13  * * *
14  * * *
15  * * *
16  * * *
17  * * *
18  * * *
19  * * *
20  * * *
21  * * *
22  * * *
23  * * *
24  * * *
25  * * *
26  * * *
27  * * *
28  * * *
29  * * *
30  * * *

@ijuliank

i dont see why this is needed, its around 40/50ms?

In the meantime, Cloudflare & NextDNS are having a latency at 0.7ms at my end. Better CDN resolution as well.

SukkaW avatar Aug 16 '23 16:08 SukkaW

We don't mind adding Hong-Kong, but we'll only do that after adding India (hopefully in Q1 2024). All new locations are postponed until it happens.

ameshkov avatar Aug 17 '23 08:08 ameshkov

We don't mind adding Hong-Kong, but we'll only do that after adding India (hopefully in Q1 2024). All new locations are postponed until it happens.

Understandable. Thanks very much!

SukkaW avatar Aug 17 '23 08:08 SukkaW

+1 A server in HongKong would also benefit Vietnam, China, Taiwan... Connection from Vietnam (especially North Vietnam) to HongKong is usually better and stable than to Singapore. https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardDNS/issues/631

trmdi avatar Sep 16 '23 01:09 trmdi