Adamant36

It's been six months since the issue was opened and there are now 12,255 uses of tourism=camp_pitch (double the original amount) and 7,526 of them have ref=* tags. So, any...

> What's wrong with rendering ones without a ref= tag? I assume only rendering ones with refrence numbers weeds out the ones not being mapped at camp-sites. Although, I think...

> Is there not a case to be made that "if you book it, they will come" Not everything can or should be rendered. Instead, there needs to be a...

> At high zoom levels if simple icons indicating tent, caravans, electricity, water, etc. could also prove useful as long as it doesn't make the map too busy. I don't...

> Perhaps a specific icon is not required. If they can be mapped as both buildings and not buildings maybe it would be good to have an icon so that...

> The argument in the former thread "rendeing is not nessesary here, because these objects are not common-useful" is not quite logical too, since in OSM also offices, (private) clubs,...

> I would prefer to see this rendered in a similar fashion to amenity=fire_station. Perhaps green instead of red. Green is usually reserved for leisure or natural features. Emergency objects...

It needs to be in the proper format and probably refined a little, but I think something similar to this would work. It's way hard to show any details at...

So are individual trees really. I think street lamps would at least be more relevent to render due to OSM being based on road mapping. At least street lamps play...

@SomeoneElseOSM, have you found anywhere on your map where rendering them clutters things up to much? Do you have any opinion on if it would be an issue or not?