AdamKorcz

Thank you for the PR! I am not much for landing this. I have experienced some issues with enforcing this dependency upon projects in the build script. Vendoring and conflict...

@jonathanmetzman IMO this is a good first step to get the Go 1.18 runtime engine integrated. It will need more work which includes: - Getting rid of the `--engine` flag...

Thanks a lot for this. Is there any chance you could also get rid of the `-r` flag?

> Sure, is there any particular reason that was left as a TODO - anything to look out for here? Not really. There shouldn't be anything contextual in OSS-Fuzz that...

This will be fixed once Go fuzzing is fully integrated into Clusterfuzz. The issue is not a blocker for running the fuzzers in OSS-Fuzz. Istio solved it by not placing...

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

> What is the advantage to using the AdaLogistics library over the built-in functionality in Go 1.18? The go-fuzz-headers library offers a number of useful features for fuzzing, but these...

> @AdamKorcz any updates here? Sorry for the delay. I will look into changing the fuzzers to the 1.18 engine when I get a moment. Thanks for the ping!

Hi @akosthekiss, thank you for your good questions. > Q: Are you speaking on behalf of Google? No. I am an independent contributor to the OSS-fuzz project. I will be...

I have made a few modifications to allow the `-fsanitize` flag to be added in case the `--oss-fuzz` flag is not passed to `build.py`.