Ad Schellevis
Ad Schellevis
probably, but the first step is adding support for additional providers. We can rename in a future major release, no need to rush anything as naming is only cosmetic.
@vzeller do you have a concrete example where this would save time? I haven't seen many cases where you would like to have all options except some.
I'm only using ET's rules, but in practice you really only want to filter either full sets (files) or things that are clearly specified (and have limited options), such as...
Maybe it's better to start with a ticket explaining the issue you want to solve, either I don't understand the use-case (which is perfectly possible) or this option doesn't add...
https://github.com/opnsense/core/commit/cc97dd579c572c6c628ac968896868bdb8548e8b
Out of curiosity, your problem relates to the monitoring part of the service? For the forwarding part it feels a bit odd trying to stop a service that wouldn't receive...
Totally my mistake, had `relayd` in my head while reading the PR, for dhcp relay there might be scenario's where you don't want to forward the discoveries indeed.
it might be good to fix the startup on backup first, but further than that I have no objections.
@AndyX90 maybe we better turn this into a feature request first. There are some questions which lead to design choices in the eventual solution. If we pin the behavior to...
@AndyX90 in case you want to test, this https://github.com/opnsense/core/commit/6e7e2a3225c3ad910b9bbfb04a539f25909d1e25 should offer carp vhid tracking per relay, similar to openvpn and wireguard.