Ad Schellevis

@vincente666 how is the feature called in Forcepoint (link to documentation might help)? I'm not against (optionally) allowing stateful traffic inbound to the zone, naming is one of the issues...

@vincente666 that sounds like captive portal indeed, but the real question is how is allowing inbound traffic called in their case (or another vendor)? reverse doesn't really sound logical as...

priority, scope, external references to similar features to name a few. Our time is limited, the feature scope and possible side affects need to be clear enough. Not against adding...

> Hi @AdSchellevis, Did you try calling me? I got a random phone call from the Netherlands. nope

you can't merge this into a plugin as there is no integration point for it. At the moment it's not a priority to work on this, my earlier questions have...

> I know that there is no integration for a plugin for the current captive portal. The idea would be to duplicate the whole functionality in the plugin to add...

let's keep this PR open, at the moment there's no option to include the feature, but if I do need to do additional testing for captive portal, I'll take a...

how on earth would that help to solve a lack of (community) time???? If you do prefer me loosing interest at all for a feature you likely (commercially) need, my...

It won't write that value as the configuration still contains the old one, editing however will show the first item in the list.... option lists are only able to show...

That would be the responsibility of the plugin in question.... (I expect a configd command was changed in this case, the description shouldn't be very important as the key is...