Sebastian Göls

Disabling it in the `Directory.Build.props` is how we actually disabled it 😜 I've just had a quick poke at modifying the source code (just `CommunityToolkit.Mvvm` and not the other projects)...

The easiest solution would probably be to rename it and adapt the code-generation accordingly :( No idea how much work that would be tho.

I didn't think that. But I thought of yet another possible solution: Add the `[CLSCompliant(true)]` attribute just to the `ObservableObject` class.

> do you care about CLS compliance? As per my original issue: > This we do not want to change.

Yes. For simplicity I'll just say "my employer" 😅

Works for me. Try updating to latest version

I've recently printed a few parts that have really good bed adhesion for most of it, but extremely bad adhesion in two corners as there is very thin "arms" extending...

Draft, as I am not completely sure about this feature. Waiting for feedback before marking as ready for review.

The little feedback I've received so far was positive so I guess if no one else is going to review, we can merge.