Aaron Gray

@nightpool Its a separate more formal channel thats associated with this repo and the issues, that is less formal than issues, and where ideas and queries do not get lost...

NNTP would be nice, Google is dropping Google Groups a.k.a. UseNet apparently. I think a Q&A style discussions would still be fine for our purposes.

@ThisIsMissEm There is a separate forum based ActivityPub discussion group, but its not for the spec itself, more just for implementors. I suppose we have to use issues here rather...

@nightpool The idea was to have something associated with this repo. I think something separate would probably just get ignored and forgotten about over time.

@fastest963 - any news ?

It would been good to have both `faker.person.sex()` and also `faker.person.gender()` to allow for fluid genders, which can randomly be mapped to sex or we have four types which can...

Gender pronouns would be too.

Gender from `faker.person.gender()` maybe a string with a colon `"male:female"` being sex:birth_sex maybe ?

@psecuresystem no that does not seem to work, thanks anyway.

@lawrentiy - I am delaying updating until this issue is fixed.