AUTOMATIC1111
[Feature Request]: Truly nullifiable attention (focus/weight) on words
Is there an existing issue for this?
- [X] I have searched the existing issues and checked the recent builds/commits
What would your feature do ?
It would be nice if the weight enclosed in brackets was zero the affected words would not apply.
I was playing around with making a sequence of images that progressed from one extreme to another. Something like:
a photo of a (short fat ugly man:1) (tall muscular handsome:0) man working out at the gym
I was going to manually decrease the first value while increasing the other to make a series of images showing a transition between the two states.
While trying this (with the same seed throughout) I noticed while rerolling images that the man wasn't as ugly as I would expect at the beginning or as lean as I would expect at the end, so I took out the 0 value section and found a totally different image was generated which much more accurately portrayed the features of the remaining (100% section) applied the way I was expecting.
I don't have a clue how diffusers work but I had expected that a 0 value applied to a parentheses enclosed section would remove any effect. I would like it to do so.
I will now try playing around with the [from:to:when] of prompt editing but I kinda wanted the latents of each thing to interfere with each other once in the middle.
Proposed workflow
- Use of "(something:0)" in a prompt would not affect the generated image at all
Additional information
No response
Had noticed this as well while doing some prompt testing. Anything above 1 becomes quite tangible, but going the opposite way with values below 1, even up to 0.1 feels like it's happening between 0.9 and 1.0 and not 0 and 1.
Had noticed this as well while doing some prompt testing. Anything above 1 becomes quite tangible, but going the opposite way with values below 1, even up to 0.1 feels like it's happening between 0.9 and 1.0 and not 0 and 1.
Wow, I hadn't really noticed how useless values under 1 were. Just did a 0.001 and 1.0 comparison between a (tall statuesque beautiful woman:X), maybe only a few pixels different
