pyart icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
pyart copied to clipboard

Improving plot_ppi_section for unordered VCPs (e.g., 88D SAILS)

Open deeplycloudy opened this issue 8 years ago • 3 comments

When WSR-88D data are in a SAILS VCP mode (elevation pattern below), it causes the PPI cross section plot to drop or oddly overplot some rays. This can be worked around with a manual call to extract_sweeps, but I propose that this situation be automatically detected and corrected for the user.

The list of elevations angles is: [0.48339844, 0.48339844, 0.87890625, 0.87890625, 1.31835938, 1.31835938, 0.48339844, 0.48339844, 1.80175781, 2.41699219, 3.12011719, 0.48339844, 0.48339844, 3.99902344, 5.09765625, 6.41601562, 7.99804688, 0.48339844, 0.48339844, 10.01953125, 12.48046875, 15.60058594, 19.51171875]

Before extract_sweeps ppi_crosssections_22102017_reflectivity

After extract_sweeps ppi_crosssections_22102017_reflectivity

Thanks to Jessica S., an undergraduate working with me, for pointing out this bug and finding the workaround.

deeplycloudy avatar Mar 12 '18 20:03 deeplycloudy

Thanks @deeplycloudy and Jessica! A PR on this would be most welcome.. Suggest having a method that can be called by the user and then called automatically by plot ppi xsects.. We have some travel coming up but can help in a few weeks

scollis avatar Mar 12 '18 22:03 scollis

I finally had time to write up a draft of this. I put it in a gist for now.

deeplycloudy avatar Dec 07 '18 22:12 deeplycloudy

Fantastic.. I’m at AGU this week and Zach is busy with his AMS talk, but we will get to this soon. Looks fairly straightforward.. we will want to design some tests

Thanks Eric!

-sent from a mobile device-

On Dec 7, 2018, at 4:00 PM, Eric Bruning [email protected] wrote:

I finally had time to write up a draft of this. I put it in a gist for now.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

scollis avatar Dec 07 '18 22:12 scollis