Added support for postgresql_privs

[ArmiT]

[lhoss]

@ArmiT possible to get conflicts resolved with latest master? with the hope we can get this merged

[gclough]

Is this the same as #181? Which one should be merged?

[aoyawale]

probably this one but, is old and still needs work.

[nchudleigh]

I think all the naming here should really be simplified down to privs given that the underlying module is called privs.

https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/modules/postgresql_privs_module.html

[nchudleigh]

@gclough @jlozadad If I open another PR consolidating #181 and #134 with conflicts and naming issues resolved can I get a review sometime soon?

[gclough]

@nchudleigh , in short, yes. I've got some time to help with this project, and have already cleaned up a lot of old PR's. There are also some new helpers that can review/comment.

[RCM7]

@nchudleigh did you end up opening another PR? I'm looking forward to having this. Can also try to contribute if needed.

[nchudleigh]

@RCM7 No, I got frustrated with the pace of the maintainers and stopped contributing to this project. I went with an approach of using the core ansible postgres modules and found that was good enough for my use-case.

[RCM7]

@nchudleigh yeah I ended up doing the same !

[egmont1227]

Related to Issue #175

[Pyton]

Any progress on this?